Answer:
B) proportional
Explanation:
In the case of the proportional tax structure the marginal tax rate should be equivalent to the average tax rate without considering the high level of taxable income or low level of taxable income
Therefore in the given case, the tax structure should be proportional
hence, the correct option is B
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
$34,500
Explanation:
Calculation to determine total revenues for the year
Using this formula
Total revenues=Increase in Assets+Decreased in liabilities+Dividends+Expenses
Let plug in the formula
Total revenues=($11,000-$19,000)+($9,000-$7,500)+$4,000+$21,000
Total revenues=$8,000+$1,500+$4,000+$21,000
Total revenues=$34,500
Therefore total revenues for the year is $34,500
In my opinion, bad neighborhoods have a large amount of cell phone stores because the people in the bad neighborhood usually don't come across (or have for that matter) phones. And to see the 'cool' cellphones in person and to have the people sell it in person, the people in the bad neighborhood should want it more. And considering the modern generation we are living in right now, people like technology and want it, in the term 'humans as economical creatures', a human's want will never be satisfied, they will always want more. So, as I said, people and their families like technology, and all the cellphone sellers will come to the neighborhoods who will buy and want more, why would they sell in places where people already have cell phones, so they go to bad neighborhoods.
unless you mean 'bad' isn't 'not highly rich' then I don't know, but as a thirteen year old, I tried.
Answer:
They must deposit $5,113,636.36.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Cash flow= $225,000
Interest rate= 4.4 percent
To determine the amount to be deposited today, we need to use the perpetual annuity formula:
PV= Cf/i
Cf= cash flow
PV= 225,000/0.044
PV= $5,113,636.36
They must deposit $5,113,636.36.
Answer:
5.47%
Explanation:
The computation of yield to maturity is shown in the attachment:
Given that
FV = $1000
PV = ($980)
PMT = 5% ÷ 2 × 1,000 = $25
Number of years = 5 years × 2 = 10 Years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula, the yield to maturity is
= 2.73 × 2
= 5.46%
Therefore with the help of spreadsheets (as attached), we could explain in a better manner.
