<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
When he was 20 years of age, provincial American Benjamin Franklin had effectively gone through two years functioning as a printer in London. He came back to Philadelphia in 1726. Amid the ocean voyage home, he kept a diary that included a considerable lot of his perceptions of the common world. Franklin was curious, understandable and keen on acing the universe.
All out sun oriented shrouds are not uncommon wonders; at regular intervals overall one happens some place on Earth. Franklin and his shipmates likely had seen overshadow previously. What was diverse for Franklin and his age was another comprehension of the reasons for obscurations and the likelihood of precisely anticipating them.
Answer:
It definitely would have an ironic mood. It would have the reader feeling a sense of dread, knowing what's going to happen at the end.
Explanation:
The entire story except for the end of The Lottery was like a cheerful mood. The town was all gathered for a pleasant gathering, the lottery. However, once you reach the end of the story, it takes a dark turn, having the town members turn against the winner by throwing stones at her.
It would have an ironic mood once you read it for the second time because you know that all that cheerfulness and pleasantness of the town gathering is false, because they are planning to stone the winner because of tradition. Being ironic means that something unexpected happens, like the reverse of what you think would happen. It's like being sarcastic.
For example, if you studied for a test for 10 years and then find out the test you were studying for didn't exist anymore, it would be ironic.
So, reading The Lottery again would totally be ironic. It seems like they're all having a good time, but really they're going to kill one of their own. This goes hand in hand with the second question, how would knowing how the story ends change the whole thing. You're expecting a lighthearted gathering, but really you know that they are going to stone someone.
Overall, Thoreau wanted to prove that not everyone will easily flow with the rules of society. As a result, he calls the people who go different paths than the ones of society "different drummers."
In conclusion, your final answer should be A.
Explanation:
which play are u talking about?
The predicate would be Hopes to leave
