Answer:
The answer is letter A, the Northern states depended on manufacturing and Southern states depended on agriculture.
Explanation:
The question above primarily focuses on the Civil War that happened in the United States from <em>1861 to 1865.</em> There was a huge war between the Northern states and the Southern states. There were many reasons why the war happened, but it was mainly because of the pressing situation brought about by slavery. This was later on abolished by <em>Abraham Lincoln,</em> the USA president during those times.
Let's talk about the economies of the two states.
Northern states- By this time (1861-1865), slavery was no longer an issue in this state. Instead, people focused more on the production of different goods from the factories. This was also the time when many European people immigrated into the country. They chose the Northern states because it was <em>well-developed than the Southern states. Many people were more educated than those in the South.</em>
This clearly shows that the Northern states depended on manufacturing because they were more industrialized than the South.
Southern states- The Southern States was more tropical than the North. It made the region<em> suitable for agriculture.</em> People relied mostly on the job of farming such as producing cottons. Unlike the North, the South had difficulty with transportation and only a few of the people were educated.
This clearly shows that the Southern states depended on agriculture.
Answer:
The use of toxic chemicals as weapons dates back thousands of years, but the first large scale use of chemical weapons was during World War I.[1][2] They were primarily used to demoralize, injure, and kill entrenched defenders, against whom the indiscriminate and generally very slow-moving or static nature of gas clouds would be most effective. The types of weapons employed ranged from disabling chemicals, such as tear gas, to lethal agents like phosgene, chlorine, and mustard gas. This chemical warfare was a major component of the first global war and first total war of the 20th century. The killing capacity of gas was limited, with about ninety thousand fatalities from a total of 1.3 million casualties caused by gas attacks. Gas was unlike most other weapons of the period because it was possible to develop countermeasures, such as gas masks. In the later stages of the war, as the use of gas increased, its overall effectiveness diminished. The widespread use of these agents of chemical warfare, and wartime advances in the composition of high explosives, gave rise to an occasionally expressed view of World War I as "the chemist's war" and also the era where weapons of mass destruction were created.[3][4]
The use of poison gas by all major belligerents throughout World War I constituted war crimes as its use violated the 1899 Hague Declaration Concerning Asphyxiating Gases and the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare, which prohibited the use of "poison or poisoned weapons" in warfare.[5][6] Widespread horror and public revulsion at the use of gas and its consequences led to far less use of chemical weapons by combatants during World War II.
Explanation:
In the antebellum south, slaves did free labor. Slaves were considered property, and they were property because they were black. Their status as property was enforced by violence -- actual or threatened. Besides planting and harvesting, there were numerous other types of labor required on plantations and farms. Enslaved people had to clear new land, dig ditches, cut and haul wood, slaughter livestock, and make repairs to buildings and tools. In many instances, they worked as mechanics, blacksmiths, drivers, carpenters, and in other skilled trades. Black women carried the additional burden of caring for their families by cooking and taking care of the children, as well as spinning, weaving, and sewing.
Some slaves worked as domestics, providing services for the master's or overseer's families. These people were designated as "house servants," and though their work appeared to be easier than that of the "field slaves," in some ways it was not. They were constantly under the scrutiny of their masters and mistresses, and could be called on for service at any time. They had far less privacy than those who worked the fields.
Answer: B. Allowed political stability
Explanation: took the test 100% right
