Answer:
Answer to the following question is as follows
Explanation:
The main goal of Steinback's novel The Grapes of Wrath is to demonstrate how one family's hardship is representative of many other farming families. He wrote it to show the terrible working and living conditions of California's migrant labourers in the 1930s.
The Grapes of Wrath author John Steinbeck stated that his objective was to "tear a reader's emotions to rags." Steinbeck hoped that readers would be able to experience the lives of the Dust Bowl immigrants with someone he had spent time.
The following poster was used to persuade Americans to contribute to the war effort by not sharing any secret information that may help the opponent win the war. 'A key to victory' will tell the reader that this would help America. A key is used and so are lips with a keyhole, thus the visual images would tell a person that they need to 'shut their mouth' and keep quiet so they have a chance of winning the war.
My argument is quite repetitive so if you can change it up a bit then you will get full marks on your test/assignment. Good luck :)
Answer:
First:<u> O "You need one thing and one thing only: one. With one-I am speaking of the numeral, of course—you can do almost
</u>
<u>anything."
</u>
Second:<u> O "Just as there are infinitely large numbers, there are infinitely small numbers. And an infinite number of infinitely small
</u>
<u>numbers."</u>
<u></u>
Explanation:
<em>The first answer choice shows how you can do almost anything with the numeral. This promotes a positive view on mathmatics because it states, "the numeral, of course-you can do almost anything."</em>
<em>The second answer choice shows how there are an infinite amount of numbers both big and small. This shows the positive view on math because it shows how any number is possible.</em>
<em>The other two answers that remain do not leave a positive view on mathmatics.</em>
Im assuming the italicized word is who, therefore it is an interrogative pronoun, which means that it is asking a certain question. <span />
It important to note that In his Message to Congress, Andrew Jackson employs excellent diction as well as logical arguments to establish a sophisticated tone.
In contrast, Michael Rutledges' account of the Trail of Tears uses diction that isn't particularly wordy, but it effectively conveys the themes, allowing us to comprehend how difficult the Trail of Tears was.
<h3>What is a tone?</h3>
A tone is the attitude of the author as communicated in their choice of words. It also has a way of creating an intended mood.
Hence, it is proper to to state that Andrew Jacksons' tone was more sophisticated that those of Michael Rutledge.
Learn more about tones at:
brainly.com/question/12176973
#SPJ1
