1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
4vir4ik [10]
3 years ago
15

During the 1920s, why was Prohibition difficult to enforce?

History
2 answers:
expeople1 [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Dahasolnce [82]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<h3>A. People found ways to obtain and transport illegal liquor. </h3>

Explanation:

The National prohibition of alcohol which was implemented during the 1920's was hard to enforce as many people were against it and people found ways to obtain and transport illegal liquor.

Production and consumption became an underground activity. The prohibition did not deter the people from purchasing and consuming alcohol. Instead it created a channel of illegal activities.

Numerous gangs and underground producers dealt in producing and transporting illegal alcohol which greatly hampered the enforcers.

You might be interested in
Why did stalin blockade west berlin in 1948? stalin wanted to protect west berlin from being taken over by the united states. st
shtirl [24]
Stalin was determined to capture West Berlin and gain concessions from the west.
8 0
3 years ago
Whose weapons were superior , the British or the Americans? explain
Soloha48 [4]
The British weapons were superior because they had more advanced technology than the Americans had been exposed too. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Constitution grant Congress the power to create "inferior courts”?
Inga [223]
I believe the answer is: The builders of the Constitution ensured the extension of the principle of checks and balances.<span>

Because of this, they separate the government branches into 3, the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judiciery.
Creating inferior courts is a way for the legislative branch of the government to checks and limit the power of the judiciery branch of the government.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The skill of a(n) _____ was highly valued on the steppes of Central Asia.
Crank
The answer is D Samurai
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is the difference between a kid being emancipated and a slave being emancipated?? how does it differ from the times of slav
damaskus [11]

The difference is quite simple, a child under the care of his parents is not a slave, or at least he is not supposed to be. A slave is a human being forced into involuntary and total servitude for the entirety of his life. A child is only under the authority of his parents until he turns 18. As of 18 years of age he/she is considered an adult and can do as he/she pleases with his own life. It needs to be remarked that authority is not the same as forced involuntary servitude (though some kids might be inclined to use such term when asked to collaborate with reasonable house chores but that is just plain hyperbolic immaturity). The emancipation of an actual slave by a slave owner is seldom voluntary and most times it is forced (it took a Civil War to settle the question). The emancipation of a kid takes place for very different reasons:

- The parents are found to neglect the well-being of the child (exploitation, sexual abuse, violent physical or psychological abuse, etc). The child is then emancipated, that is to say removed from his parent’s care and either becomes a ward of the State or the adopted son or daughter of another family).

- The child has left school at age 16 and starts working and earning his/her own salary and achieves financial independence from his /her parents. He/she marries or enters the army.

It is evident that the only similarity between the emancipation of a child and the emancipation of a slave is the use of the same word that has the same etymological source but very different meanings.

Between the times of actual slavery and now. Things have changed quite a bit. There was no legal framework for the emancipation of children, let alone laws preventing their neglect by parents. Emancipation of slaves occurred a long time before the emancipation of children was established in the 20th century. It did take place de facto before that but there was no legal framework.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did some memebers of the church do?
    11·1 answer
  • Which describes the Stamp Act of 1765? A.a tax on all printed materials B.a tax on imported tea C.a tax on locally-grown produce
    13·2 answers
  • How was the amendment process used to improve the lives of former slaves after the civil war?
    11·1 answer
  • Identify the causes of the rise of the Populist Party and the effects the party had.
    15·1 answer
  • Luther _________________with the German rulers during a _______________ revolt.
    13·1 answer
  • The first African Americans who fought for the Union during the Civil War
    6·1 answer
  • What group was fighting against the Nationalists​
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following were early Mesoamerican civilizations?
    6·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
    12·2 answers
  • Why did international trade decrease, leading to the suffering of economies all over the world?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!