Answer:
C) Asking the consumer to write his or her own letter to exercise that opt out right
Explanation:
The whole purpose behind the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)was to allow customers the right to easily opt out of information sharing by the banks. That means that the banks are required to provide an easy way for a customer to do so, and writing your own letter might be easy for some people, but very difficult for others.
It is much easier to do it by phone, or by simply mailing back a detachable form. If the client knows how to use internet and emails properly, then the bank must provide an easy option to opt out through an email or an option that can be found in the bank's website.
Answer:
$3,875
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Selling value of the home = $155,000
Commission rate = 5%
Share basis = equally
So, by considering the above information, the Muller received amount is
= Selling value of the home × commission rate ÷ share basis
= $155,000 × 5% ÷ 2
= $7,750 ÷ 2
= $3,875
By considering the all the information given in the question we can easily find out the received amount by the Muller
Answer:
1st question: false Refusing internal requests often calls for an indirect strategy. Providing adequate reasons and realistic alternatives helps maintain goodwill and a positive working environment.
2nd question: True. Refusals for routine requests should open with a buffer, a neutral statement on which both readerand writer can agree, and should transition into the reasons.
17 which should equal 215.01 I think- sorry if I’m wrong
Yes and just because yes they should