I suggest you to go with the first option. So the answer is: The area in which the law of demand best applies is <span>a.macroeconomics.</span>
1. Carpet installer (amount of <em>carpet.</em>.)
2. Land surveyor ("land boundaries")
3. Tree trimmer (removes dead <u>branches</u>)
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: in the long run, the economy reaches full employment automatically.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept of<em> ''Say's Law''</em> is a classical economic theory created by Jean-Baptiste Say whose main purpose was to establish the fact that the production of a good creates the demand of another product and that is due to the fact that if a producer sells its productions then he will use all the money earned in the purchase of another goods. Moreover, Say's Law has been one of the principal doctrines used in order to support the idea of the laissez-faire belief that a capitalist economy will naturally tend toward full employment at the long run without the regulation that a government can provide.
Answer:
Total Revenues=$393
Total Expenses=$168
Net profit=$225 million
Explanation:
An income statement is one of the three important financial statements used for reporting a company's financial performance over a specific accounting period. The income statement focuses on the four key items - revenue, expenses, gains, and losses. It does not cover receipts (money received by the business) or the cash payments/disbursements <u>(money paid by the business).</u>
The general structure of an income statement proceeds as follow:
Revenue/Sales (+)
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) (-)
=Gross Profit
Marketing, Advertising, and Promotion Expenses (-)
General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses (-)
=EBITDA
Depreciation & Amortization Expense (-)
=Operating Income or EBIT
Interest (-)
Other Expenses (-)
=EBT (Pre-Tax Income)
Income Taxes (-)
=Net Income
In this exercise:
Total Revenues=$393
Total Expenses=$168
Net profit=$225 million
Note: dividends shouldn't be included in the Income Statement
Unlawful employment practice based on the discrimination on the basis of colour, race, sex, religion, origin, etc is against the law. Lily Led-better sued the company after knowing that she’s been paid less than the male managers for the same work done and at the same time employed.
She is entitled to the equal amount of salary that the employees at her level or status are getting. Within the organization, if there is discrimination based on sex, race etc upon payment of wages or salary it will be against the rule of law.