Answer:
- Differences in values
- C. Tariffs and import quotas generally reduce economic welfare.
Explanation:
Yvette and Sean most likely have a difference in values because they believe that one thing is better for the economy than the other. This means that when it comes down to the economy, they value a certain approach over other approaches.
Economist don't usually find common ground on many things but there are some things where they have a general consensus and one of them is that tariffs and import quotas are bad for the economy. They believe that people stand more to gain from free trade than restricted trade.
Answer:
A) continue it.
Explanation:
The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 requires businesses with more than 50 employees to allow employees to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave per year in order to take care of a newborn child, or adopt a child, or take care of the spouse or child that suffers from a serious health condition, or if the employee suffers from a serious health condition. If the family member belongs to the military is involved, then the leave time extends to 26 weeks per year.
Answer:
This will cause the demand for labor to decline.
The demand for labor will thus increase.
This is a type of frictional unemployment.
Explanation:
If the world price of steel falls. The quantity supplied of steel will also decline. The firms will thus need a fewer quantity of labor. This will cause the demand for labor to decline.
A reduction in the price of steel means that the input cost of automobile-producing firms will decline. This will cause the firms to produce more. They will need more labor to produce more. The demand for labor will thus increase.
This is a type of frictional unemployment. Frictional unemployment is the type of unemployment that is caused because of shifts between jobs.
The government can improve a widely used job-search website so that it matches workers to job vacancies more effectively. It can also a cash bonus if they find a new job within a specified number of weeks.
Answer: $500
Explanation:
Based on the scenario in the question, there's a breach of contract as the shirts aren't delivered and there are 50 t-shirts which cost $10 each that no one law is willing to buy because it has a school name and their mascot on the front.
Here, the maker of the shirt can sue for damages and since there's no resale, the amount to be sued for damages will be the price of each shirt multiplied by the total number of shirt. This will be:
= $10 × 50
= $500