Answer:
There are 5 degrees of freedom.
Explanation:
If we want to find the degree of freedom in a chi-square check, the sample size was ' n ' then the number of degrees of freedom to be used in measurements would be n-1.
For a sample size of N=6, measure the degrees of freedom. Subtract 1 (df=6-1=5) from 6. of freedom in chi- square test .
- Degree of freedom = (N-1).
- Degree of freedom = (6-1)
therefore, the value of df is 5.
Answer: Subsequent events
Explanation:
Reviewing transactions is what gives accountability in organization, without this organizations would not know when they are running at a loss or making gains. The best time to do this is at the end of yearly transactions, the procedure required to verify this transactions are referred to as subsequent events, meaning events that happened as time went on.
This act is carried out most times by auditors
Answer: Debit Accounts receivable for $600.
Explanation:
The customer had not been billed so that means that they still owe the company. This would make them an accounts receivable so the adjusting entry will have to debit the Accounts Receivable account for $600 to show that it is increasing.
This amount will be credited to the Accrued revenue account to show that the cash has not yet been received.
Answer:
The answer is D. All of the above are plausible
Explanation:
A. Opportunity costs are relatively low is reasonable because as football game is taking place, most of the local people will go to the field to enjoy the field rather than spending their time at local shops/restaurants. Moreover, there are not many people from other towns visiting these facilities because of far distance.
B. is reasonable because it is high school football not professional football so the expenses spent on watching the game is low.
C. is is plausible because these towns are quite remote so watching their young neighbors/relatives playing may be one of the few entertainment choices available to them in weekend.
=> So, the answer is D.
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
a) Usually a contract has the following elements:
Offer
.
Acceptance
.
Consideration
.
Intention to create a legal relationship
.
In the given case, the intention to create a legal relationship is missing. Though Study had sent a written legal contract to Burrow to affirm the contract, Burrow did not show any interest regarding the same. Hence Burrow can’t be sued for breach of contracts. Moreover the confirmation letter sent by Study does not qualify under the Merchant Memo Rule as the involved parties are not merchants. Burrow can use the terms of UCC for his favour. The UCC states that any contract with value more than $500 must be in writing. As the involved amount in this case is $1300, hence this case does not qualify as a contract under UCC.
b) If Study and Burrow were merchants, then the Merchant Memo Rule gets applicable. Then in that case, if 2 merchants enter into an oral contract, which is worth $500 or more and one of the merchant sends a written confirmation for the same, then a contract will be considered enforceable. In such a case, Burrow will be held liable for breach of contract and can be sued by Study.
