Answer:
I believe the correct answer here would be A. D comes close, but Starbuck's 'rule' is more of a request rather than an outright ban, as the open letter on their website states: "First, this is a request and not an outright ban. Why? Because we want to give responsible gun owners the chance to respect our request—and also because enforcing a ban would potentially require our partners to confront armed customers, and that is not a role I am comfortable asking Starbucks partners to take on."
Answer:
uiwkwkwhsgdhdn k known ikop
The answer is "facial feedback" effect.
The <span>facial feedback effect theory explains that when someone imitates some facial expressions it actually affect his or her emotional response, for example if during an even one person who is not enjoying the event is forced to smile and laugh, eventually he will find the even more joyful and might start enjoying the event.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is b generation effect
Explanation:
It is the name of the research Generation effect (delineation of a phenomena) that was done by Norman Slamecka and Peter Graf in the University of Toronto, Toronto Canada. It was tested on 24 volunteer students of introductory physiology in which each student was given 100 items separated by cards each card presented a word and the initial letter of the response e. g. (rapid-f). The participants were given five rules 1. Associate (lamp-light) 2. Category (Ruby-diamond) 3. Opposite (Long- short) 4. Synonym (sea-ocean) 5. Rhyme (save-cave), the students were given blocks of 20 cards with a new rule each time. Then 12 of the participants were tested again later and the results do not pointed significantly to the generation effect in the third experimentation with 24 participants divided this way 12(informed participants) and 12 (uninformed participants) The results had a clear cut and pointed to the generation effect. After five experiments there was established the existence of the phenomena in which when a word was generated in the presence of a stimulus and an encoding rule it was better remembered than when the same word was simply read under those conditions (Slamecka & Graf 1978).
