Answer:
In my personal opinion, it is easy because if you know what to write down and can write it down correctly, then it is simple.
Explanation:
Answer:
No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is not true because the limitation was not communicated to her. Since she walked into a store and asked to have her dress cleaned, the individual at the front desk should have explicitly mentioned the pricing and policy to her so that she knew what she was accepting by leaving her dress at the store. Since they did not do this then they must pay her the $300 that the dress is worth.
Answer: Rights that were not listed would be unprotected. Hope that helps:)
Answer:
The answer is A. Punishment for diving.
Explanation:
Hitting her head on the board during her last dive acted as a punisment for diving because it was an unfavorable outcome for a behavior, in this case the behavior was the diving. The purpose of a punishment is to decrease the appearance of a behavior, which is why, after hitting her head, Angela refuses to dive again.
Base on the behavior of Carlos, the best approach that will
explain the behavior that he has shown would empathy altruism hypothesis. This
is where a person has the ability of feeling empathy in other people and tries
to put themselves in their situation, where in they try to be more
understanding and tries to share the same emotion that the person would feel
because of the situation that he or she is in. It is also with this, it makes a
person help the other party without expecting anything from return and helping
them because he or she wants to and not because he or she is expecting anything
or is only obliged to do it. It is seen from Carlos actions as he helps the
woman who has been begging for alms and tries to put himself into her shoes
where he felt pain into seeing her go through in that situation.
