Answer:
The answer is: This is an example of a mixed methods design.
Explanation:
A mixed methods research design is a methodology that aims to gather and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data in order to comprehend a social phenomenon. It is based on the idea that social problems are too complex to be explain only by a quantitative or a qualitative study. In using both, the researcher can obtain a broader idea of the problem in terms of the larger population, but also, gain depth in the analysis.
Within the quantitative part of the study the research usually uses surveys, and when gathering qualitative data he can use in depth interviews, focus groups or participant observation.
A person with Wernicke's aphasia: is similar to a normal person who is just highly distracted.
Aphasia is AN impairment of language operation that is localized to the dominant cerebral hemisphere. Wernicke encephalopathy is characterized by impaired language comprehension. Despite this impaired comprehension, speech could have a standard rate, rhythm, and grammar. the foremost common reason behind Wernicke’s aphasia is a CVA touching the posterior lobe of the dominant hemisphere.
This activity outlines the analysis and management of patients with Wernicke aphasia and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in managing patients with this condition. Aphasia is an impairment of language function which is localized to the dominant cerebral hemisphere. Traditionally, aphasia is categorized as either communicative (Broca) or receptive (Wernicke) aphasia. several patients have an element of each style of aphasia.
Learn more about Wernicke's aphasia here: brainly.com/question/11743451
#SPJ4
Its important so that no one person has to much power
Assuming this is a true/false question:
Social influence occurs when one's emotions, opinions, or behaviors are affected by other is a true statement. Social influences would be influenced by mainly things like peer pressure, conformity and persuasion, just to name a few. Social influence isn't always something negative and it can be a positive thing, as well. Sometime peer pressure is GOOD with the right type of pressure, i.e. to get good grades because all the other kids in the class are doing well and you don't want to look dumb. Things like that can help drive us to succeed.
Full Question:
Jane operates a home decorations shop selling slightly used goods. She bought a painting from Sally for the shop. Bob came into the shop and asked if the painting was by Bill, a local artist of some repute. Jane, without checking with Sally, says, "I'm sure it is" because she really did think it looked like one of Bill's paintings. Bob bought the painting. A week or so later, he took the painting by Bill's studio. Bill just laughed and said that he never painted anything that horrible. Bob took the painting back to Jane and asked for a refund. Jane refused on the basis that she never gave refunds and that Bob took the risk that the painting was not done by Bill. Should Bob sue in small claims court, who will likely win and why?
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
b. Bob, on the basis of innocent misrepresentation.
c. Bob, on the basis of a unilateral mistake.
d. Jane, on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss.
e. Jane, both on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss and that he agreed by an oral contract to purchase the painting.
Answer:
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
Negligent misrepresentation
occurs when someone makes a statement without making sure this statement is based on true facts. Negligent misrepresentation happens when a person may not lie directly (saying something knowing it to be untrue), but makes a statement about something with no factual backing. Bob will likely win here because Jane "assumed" the painting was from Bill without confirming it was.