The most expectable answer is socialization.
This term is used to describe the process in which people learn the values, norms, and beliefs of a particular society/culture.
Therefore, for this indian couple, their early and previously-arranged marriage is nothing unusual because they were taught that's the most common thing for (indian) people to do. And you, well, you were taught differently; probably: that is better to wait until you grow old enough, and are sufficiently independent, to support a household. So, you get a "cultural shock" by hearing about how this couple got married.
Answer:
to emphasize the characteristics of groups; is to emphasize individual cases
Answer:
Treaty of Paris was one result of the Spanish American war.. In it Spain renowned style claim to Cuba Siri Guam and Puerto Rico to be married states and transferred over to the Philippines to the United States for 20 million dollars
The importance of faith excerpts from of plymouth plantation recall later moments or patterns of thought in american history, even in our own time.
The work is taken into account among the foremost significant of early American literature and Plymouth plantation history, not just for its artistic and historical value but also its influence on the event of the national character of the U.S. of America.
One of the foremost fascinating aspects of Plymouth Plantation is the way that Bradford depicts the connection between violence—directed at Native Americans, neighboring colonies, and even Plymouth Plantation's own people—and the latest state of print.
The Bradford journal records the events of the primary 30 years of settlement, likewise because of the reactions of the Plymouth colonists to those events, and it's regarded by historians as the preeminent work of 17th century America.
Tone. William Bradford's tone throughout the story could be a tone of faithfulness. it's known from his repeated reference and of how he speaks about the sailors' need in God to survive the voyage.
learn more about Plymouth plantation: brainly.com/question/19737965
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient evidence that it is harmful or immoral.
Explanation:
Hello! A type of food does not become immoral for someone's tastes, even if it disgusts you and you personally choose not to eat it because it’s not your type of dish, it is not an opinion that transforms food directly into something prohibited or charged with negative connotation, since it is something subjective that does not influence a culture.
