Answer:
The entry is not required because the outcome is reasonably possible, not certain or probable. So IAS 37 says that the liability must not be recognized as the outcome is not reasonably certain or probable.
Explanation:
The liability must be included in the financial statement only if the outcome is certain or probable. In this scenario, the outcome is reasonably possible but neither certain nor probable in this situation. So the entry in the financial statement is not required. If the liability is of a huge amount then IAS 37 says that their must be a disclosure in the financial statement notes about the lawsuit.
Answer:
Second National Bank
Present value (PV) = $5,400
Future value (FV) = $13,900
Interest rate (r) = 10% = 0.10
FV = PV(1 + r)n
$13,900 = $5,400(1 + 0.10)n
<u>$13,900</u> = (1.10)n
$5,400
2.574074074 = (1.10)n
Log 2.574074074 = n log 1.10
<u>Log 2.574074074</u> = n
Log 1.10
n = 9.9 years
None of the answers is correct
Explanation:
In this case, we will apply the formula of future value of a lump sum. The present value, interest rate and future value were provided with the exception of number of years. Thus, the number of years becomes the subject of the formula. The future value equals present value, multiplied by 1 plus interest rate, raised to power number of years.
Answer:
This leads to a reduction in net income
Explanation:
Manufacturing overheads refer to those costs which indirectly relate to a good's production. Examples of manufacturing overheads would include depreciation charged on equipments used for production, rent of the factory wherein production takes place.
The effect of recognition of $400 of estimated manufacturing overheads would be reduction in net income since their recognition raises the cost of production which reduces gross profit. Consequently this would reduce the net income.
False. They are, in fact, significantly less common.
Only workers who can demonstrate documentation of eligibility to work in the United States (US) are allowed to work<u> legally </u>in the United States, option (C) is the correct answer.
<h3>Who can be legally employed?</h3>
A country should not employ (and it is unlawful to do so / informal company) someone who is not legally permitted to work in the United States (US), an illegal immigrant is an example).
However, if you have a Visa, <u><em>you can </em></u>work in the United States without being a US citizen.
In either situation, the only stipulation is that the company wants you and that you are willing to accept the <u>compensation</u> they are providing.
For more information about legal employment, refer below
brainly.com/question/19586370?referrer=searchResults
