Explanation:
plz write in English I don't understand
Answer:
d. a palter
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Kant would call this misleading statement a palter. This term refers to a statement that has been made ambiguous in order to hide the truth from someone or in order to avoid committing yourself to something. Which in this scenario "You" are trying to hide the fact that Bill is playing "hooky" from your boss.
Answer: Chemicals such as insecticides, pesticides, and others must be kept away because they can contaminate food, and make it poisonous to anybody. Some can cause burns, vomiting, diarrhea, and in very large amounts, drowsiness or death. Chemical products may cause immediate health effects, such as skin or eye irritation or burns, or poisoning. There can also be longer-term health effects from chemicals.
Explanation:
Answer:
shift demand and supply for loanable funds to the right (up), increasing interest rates.
Explanation:
According to the Fisher hypothesis when there is an increase in the expected inflation there is an equal increase in nominal interest rates.
As interest rates rise demand and supply for loanable funds will rise. This is illustrated in the attached diagram. Interest rate moves from i0 to i1.
Inflation is a reduction in the purchasing power of money. When inflation increases money regulation agencies reduce supply of money as a way to reduce price increase. This in turn reduces the amount of loanable funds commercial banks have to give out
The best practice that Karan should adopt is:
D.
disclose to the employees that their emails will be monitored
Explanation:
To monitor the social network activities of the workers of a company is walking the line of ethics so there is a way to determine what must be the best practice keeping in line with the working culture of the company.
The people working there must be informed that their activity will be monitored so they have an understanding that it will be done.
After this one must perform checks either arbitrarily or on the basis of who seems more trustworthy and who less.