All categories

3 years ago

3 2/3 = 2 + N/3 solve for N

Mathematics

1 answer:

Charra [1.4K]3 years ago

3 0

If the question is 3*2/3=2+N/3
N=0

If the question is 2/3=2+N/3
N=-4

You might be interested in

If y=(sec^-1x)^2, then show that x^2(x^2-1) d^2y/dx^2 + (2x^3 - x) dy/dx = 2

Arisa [49]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps you in your learning process.

8 0

3 years ago

Which is the correct one???

Alik [6]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5x-22+4x+4 = 90

9x-18=90

9x=108

x=12

4*12+4

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The 1992 world speed record for a bicycle (human-powered vehicle) was set by Chris Huber. His time through the measured 200 m st

Reil [10]

Answer:

a) 30.726m/s and b) 5.5549s

Step-by-step explanation:

a.) What was Chris Huber’s speed in meters per second(m/s)?

Given the distance and time, the formula to obtain the speed is

$v=\frac{d}{t}$ .

Applying this to our problem we have that

$v=\frac{200m}{6.509s}= 30.726m/s$ .

So, Chris Huber’s speed in meters per second(m/s) was 30.726m/s.

b) What was Whittingham’s time through the 200 m?

In a) we stated that $v=\frac{d}{t}$ . This formula implies that

$t=\frac{d}{v}$ .

First, observer that $19\frac{km}{h} =19,000\frac{m}{h}=\frac{19,000}{3,600}m/s= 5.2777m/s$ .

Then, Sam Whittingham speed was equal to Chris Huber’s speed plus 5.2777 m/s. So, $v=30.726\frac{m}{s} +5.2777\frac{m}{s}= 36.003 m/s.$

Then, applying 1) we have that

$t=\frac{200m}{36.003m/s}=5.5549s.$

So, Sam Whittingham’s time through the 200 m was 5.5549s.

5 0

3 years ago

A customer member owe 16.50 and pays $20 in cash the change due is 3.50 provide the amount owe using the smallest number of bill

Daniel [21]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2 plus 6 is 8, 8 divided by 2 is 4

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Mary is the manager of a new clothing shop. The shop located in a new shopping mall and Mary wants to estimate the average daily

sergeinik [125]

Explanation:

a) First, note that the Type I error refers to a situation where the null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually true. Hence, her null hypothesis would be H0: mean daily demand of her clothes in this region should be greater than or equal to 100.

The implication of Type I error in this case is that Mary rejects that the mean daily demand of her clothes in this region is greater than or equal to 100 when it is actually true.

b) While, the Type II error, in this case, is a situation where Mary accepts the null hypothesis when it is actually false. That is, Mary accepts that the mean daily demand of her clothes in this region is greater than or equal to 100 when it is actually false.

c) The Type I error would be important to Mary because it shows that she'll be having a greater demand (which = more sales) for her products despite erroneously thinking otherwise.

5 0

3 years ago