The correct answer would be option B, Many of the unhappy things in people's lives are partly due to bad luck.
The above mentioned belief indicated the external locus of control.
Explanation:
The extent to which people think that they have or have not control over the outcomes of events in their lives. There are two types of locus of control:
- External Locus of Control
- Internal Locus of Control
In external locus of control, people believe that they don't have any control over the events happening in their lives and all such events are happening due to the luck, fate, circumstances, injustice, etc. On the contrary, people with internal locus of control believe that everything happening in their lives are due to their own selves.
So in the given question, option B gives us the best example of the external locus of control, in which it is said that Many of unhappy things in people's lives are partly due to bad luck. So it means the people believe that bad things are happening due to their luck, which is an external factor and is out of their control.
Learn more about locus of control at:
brainly.com/question/1182564
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Exploitation of labour is the act of using power to systematically extract more value from ... In other terms, this entails the worker being able to maintain living conditions sufficient to be able to continue work. ... The primary concept is that there is exploitation towards a factor of production, if it receives less than its marginal ...
In this case, Emma was not part of the market for Prodigy Placement, and her parents were part of the market because Emma lacked the desire.
The market of Prodigy Placement is specifically aimed for parents who want to send their children to the school since students at the school are considered in the top 1% of their age group in terms of IQ scores and aptitude.
Answer:
A participate in election campaigns
Explanation:
Answer:
The Sons of Liberty were a grassroots group of instigators and provocateurs in colonial America who used an extreme form of civil disobedience—threats, and in some cases actual violence—to intimidate loyalists and outrage the British government.
Explanation:
