Answer:
Following are the answer to this question:
In question first, the answer is "Option d".
In question second, the answer is "Option e".
In question third, the answer is "Option e".
In question fourth, the answer is "Option e ".
In question fifth, the answer is "Option b".
Explanation:
Given values:

Solution:
= $400000000+$340000000+$4000000
= $744000000

= $744000000
+ $50000000+$6000000+$850000000
= $1,650,000,000
-
Saving account deposits, which means its amount of money increased throughout the M2 portion regular savings account. So M2 will grow
- Its increase in the number of employees may not impact the balance sheet with banks, because each bank maintains its entire cash flow
- For banks, loans are investments if they're lending money as a bank to people. So, it's on income statement asset side
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": legislation cannot repeal basic economic motives.
Explanation:
Government price controls are regulations imposed by the central government of a country to set limits on prices of certain goods or services because of a surplus, shortage or simply to maintain the demand and supply of those products at their equilibrium level.
However, the demand for some of those products could be unpredictable because individuals could react in opposite directions even if the government has set rules against consumers' favor. <em>Customers' motives might not be always repealed by legislation</em>.
Answer: Option C
Explanation: In simple words, 360-degree feedback refers to the feedback process in which an employee receives feedback from not just its superiors but from his or her peers, subordinates and customers also. Even sometimes self evaluation is also taken into consideration.
Such process provides a clear picture of how an employee perceives themselves and what is their image in the eyes of other related parties. These processes helps an individual employee to understand their strength and weaknesses and it also provides insight for their personal development.
Answer:
b. did not know of the reward when he returned the dog.
Explanation:
Laredo advertises for getting his dog back. This does not infer that the dog will only be returned when the reward will be paid.
Miguel did not know about the reward, so the reward in this case is not mandatory to be paid, but if Laredo initiates the reward himself, that can be accepted.
This is a clear demonstration of being kind and get what you know.
So if you do not know the facts, you are on fault.
Answer:
$40,000
Explanation:
If Alan had paid the disability insurance himself, then disability income would not be taxable. But since Alan's employer paid the disability insurance premiums, then any disability payments that Alan received must be included in his gross income and are taxable.