1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dangina [55]
2 years ago
8

A supplier has offered your company a reduced price per unit for a component part you purchase if you will increase your purchas

e quantity from to units.​ Currently, you pay ​$ per unit. The supplier has offered to reduce this cost to ​$ per unit if you purchase the higher quantity. You purchase approximately of the units annually. The cost to place an order is estimated to be ​$ per order regardless of the order size. Transportation costs are estimated to be ​$ per unit. Your cost to hold a component part in inventory is estimated at ​% annually based on the cost of the purchased item. Should you continue with your current​ policy, or should you take the incentive offered by the​ supplier?
Business
1 answer:
Kitty [74]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the numbers are missing:

<em>A supplier has offered your company a reduced price per unit for a component part you purchase if you will increase your purchase quantity from 18,000 to 72,000 units.​ Currently, you pay ​$28.50 per unit. The supplier has offered to reduce this cost to ​$28.20 per unit if you purchase the higher quantity. You purchase approximately 279,000 of the units annually. The cost to place an order is estimated to be ​$360 per order regardless of the order size. Transportation costs are estimated to be ​$0.85 per unit. Your cost to hold a component part in inventory is estimated at 18​% annually based on the cost of the purchased item. Should you continue with your current​ policy, or should you take the incentive offered by the​ supplier?</em>

currently the total cost = [279,000/18,000 x $360] + (18% x $28.50 x 18,000/2) + (279,000 x $0.85) + ($28.50 x 279,000) = $5,580 + $46,170 + $237,150 + $7,951,500 = $8,240,400

total cost after proposed change in order size = [279,000/72,000 x $360] + (18% x $28.20 x 72,000/2) + (279,000 x $0.85) + ($28.20 x 279,000) = $1,395 + $182,736 + $237,150 + $7,867,800 = $8,289,081

the proposed change in order size should not be accepted and the company should continue with its current policies

You might be interested in
Match the items according to their impact on aggregate demand (AD).
postnew [5]

Answer:

A recession occurring in a trading partners economy

8 0
2 years ago
The Federal Reserve Bank of the United States is:_________.
Vilka [71]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
A stationery company plans to launch a new type of indelible ink pen. Advertising for the new product will be heavy and will cos
stich3 [128]

Answer:

The advertising spend would reduce income taxes by $2.8 million

Explanation:

The advertising expense since it is allowable expense from profits made in the year would reduce income taxes next year by  $2.8 million ($8 million *35%)

This means that because of its tax deductibility,it would make a business sense to incur the advertising cost of $8 million coupled with the fact the it has the potential to increase sales revenue over and above the current level of $280 million

3 0
3 years ago
Brandon's wallet slips from his jacket pocket in the mall. By the time he realizes his wallet is missing and reports the loss, a
VikaD [51]

Answer:

$950

Explanation:

Since the total amount of items purchased by the thief is $950, then Brandon has to pay back the amount deducted from his card.

4 0
2 years ago
Carla Vista Company purchased equipment that cost $3980000 on January 1, 2020. The entire cost was recorded as an expense. The e
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

$1,800,402

Explanation:

Cost = $3,980,000

Lifespan = 9 yrs

Residual Value = $122,000

Depreciation per year = (Cost - Residual Value)/life

Depreciation per year = (3,980,000 - 122,000)/9

Depreciation per year = 3,858,000 / 9

Depreciation per year = $428,667

So, Tax saved = 40% of $428,667 = $171,467

Depreciation per year not considered = 3 yrs * $428,667 = (+)$1,286,001

Tax saved due to Depreciation = 3 yrs * $171,467 = (+)$514,401

So, retained earnings was understated by $1,286,001 + $514,401 = $1,800,402

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whistle works sells each whistle for $12. They have a desired ending inventory for production of 20% of the next months budgeted
    5·1 answer
  • Investment increases to​ $1.5 trillion, and the multiplier when the price level is constant is 8. Draw the new aggregate demand
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is (are) TRUE?
    5·1 answer
  • Your grandfather has promised to give you​ $500 a year at the end of each of the next four years if you earn Cs or better in all
    7·2 answers
  • Fiat money has :
    6·1 answer
  • A partnership intentionally created and recognized, orally or in writing is known as a(n) _____ partnership.
    8·1 answer
  • The following financial information was taken from the books of Zone Health Club, a small spa and fitness club: Account Balances
    10·1 answer
  • For each of the following independent situations, determine whether any of the expenditures qualify as deductible education expe
    14·1 answer
  • The balance in Discount on Bonds PayableGroup of answer choicesshould be reported on the balance sheet as an asset because it ha
    5·1 answer
  • The delta of a call option on a non-dividend-paying stock is 0.4. What is the delta of the corresponding put option?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!