1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna71 [15]
3 years ago
15

If a person takes the 5th" and refuses to speak so as not to incriminate themselves, this is the 5th Amendment protection agains

t ?
Law
1 answer:
Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago
6 0

A right against forced self-incrimination.

You might be interested in
Sebutkan latar belakang dari mosi Sekolah daring masa pandemi ini mengurangi efektifitas belakar siswa!
Stells [14]

subscribes to iwpp  subscribes to iwpp  subscribes to iwpp  subscribes to iwpp  subscribes to iwpp  subscribes to iwpp  subscribes to iwpp  

7 0
3 years ago
HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Korvikt [17]

In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals, offering broad protections for whistleblowers at public companies in order to encourage fraud reporting. Private companies were considered immune to the law.

But in 2014 the Supreme Court heard a challenge to SOX, and ruled that even though the plaintiffs were not employees of the publicly traded company, the SOX whistleblower statute applied to them. The reason? They suffered retaliation for reporting alleged fraud involving financial reporting of a publicly-traded company.

Here’s what the law now says:

SOX covers employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors.

SOX covers privately-owned companies if they provide services for publicly-traded ones. Answer:

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
A country described as a multiling when​
yuradex [85]

Answer

people who speak four or more languages are generally just referred to as multilingual

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
True or false?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Describe the differences between the establishment and free clauses of the First Amendment
Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

The free exercise clause protects the religious beliefs, and to a certain extent, the religious practices of all citizens. The more controversial establishment clause prohibits the government from endorsing, supporting, or becoming too involved in religion and religious activities.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The United States Constitution and _____________________________________ establish the fundamental principles and rules by which
    9·1 answer
  • What does knowledge do to your own theoretical PPF? Why is it important at any stage of your life, but especially in high school
    12·1 answer
  • 7. Which of the following refers to a society that encompasses a wide variety of cultural
    6·1 answer
  • The following question refers to a hypothetical situation. Polls show that the country overwhelmingly agrees that we need a high
    14·1 answer
  • A judge cites precedent when delivering a ruling in a case. In doing this, he is harkening back to a practice begun in which set
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following can be a consequence of noncompliance with EEOC
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following individual is NOT considered a U.S. citizen?
    12·1 answer
  • Should cereal be considered a soup?!?​
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • When one party promises to do what she is already legally obligated to do, the law considers this a(n)_______ and not valid cons
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!