1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zzz [600]
3 years ago
13

Imagine the white car in the left lane is moving more slowly than the surrounding traffic. How is this a violation of state unif

orm traffic law?
Law
1 answer:
Aloiza [94]3 years ago
6 0

This is a violation of state uniform law due to the fact that it has been established that vehicles moving slower than the traffic have to be in the right lane.

<h3>What is the state uniform traffic law?</h3>

These are laws that have been established in states in the United States for motor vehicles. These laws have been set to be the comprehensive standards in the states.

These Uniform traffic laws have been set to be followed all through the state that it is applied.

Read more on traffic violation here:

brainly.com/question/22640490

You might be interested in
What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?
devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

  • There are two types of tortious interference
  1. Tortious interference with contract
  2. Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
  • Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0
2 years ago
Which best describes the difference between economic and social policies? O Economic policies control the supply of money, while
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Economic policies manage taxes, while social policies provide public assistance.

Explanation:

cuz i know.

5 0
2 years ago
The "iron law of oligarchy" is a principle
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

B. Of organizational life according to which even democratic organizations will become bureaucracies ruled by a few individuals.

Explanation:

The "iron law of oligarchy" notes that all types of organization must gradually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies, regardless of how democratic they may be at the outset, rendering true democracy actually and theoretically impossible, particularly in large groups and complex organisations, it is an Organizational theory in which even a democratic entity inevitably evolves into a bureaucracy dominated by a few individuals.

The "iron law of oligarchy " reflects that if a democratic organisation, then a non-democratic organisation, will never be fully democratic.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from a folktale.
agasfer [191]

Answer:

Watch out for hunters’ nets in the jungle. JK!

right answer: When we help others, we help ourselves.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
I need 5 claims against gun control laws.
djyliett [7]

Answer:

1. we already have laws

2. banning the use of guns is unconstitutional (2nd amendment)

3. it's not the gun itself but the person behind the gun

4. gun control has been proven to be unsuccessful (look at Australia's homicide rates with various weapons)

5. banning or limiting guns restricts our access to protection against other people, corrupt government, etc

Explanation:

for #3, more ppl stop school shootings, mass murders, etc. before they happen, but they never show up on the news bc it's not a good enough story. social media and even the news nowadays is super biased, never shows all of the facts, and exaggerates things, so don't believe everything you see on the internet.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the worst thing one person can do in order to get the longest sentence in prison?
    8·2 answers
  • Before becoming a cabinet level department in the executive branch where was the Department of Homeland Security located?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following attributes is a characteristic of humanism?
    5·1 answer
  • You are a person who feels that the most important constitutional principles are the
    13·1 answer
  • What system of justice that we use today was based on a system used during the reign of Henry ll?
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an argument?
    8·1 answer
  • How are the Florida
    6·2 answers
  • por que hay que unirce a su canar para ver una respues si lo que la persona quiere es saver si lo que tiene esta bien eso no es
    7·1 answer
  • Application letter for Malawi army recruitment
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!