Answer:
Locking in customers.
Explanation:
July Networks is locking in customers for the next two years by telling them to subscribe with July Networks. This will keep these customers loyal to them for two years, during which they can further implement retention strategies to keep the customers with them more than two years.
This is a good business strategy and customers are attracted to subscribe because of the cutting edge television technology that is being provided by July Networks.
<span>An opportunity cost is the value or benefit that must be given up to acquire or achieve something else. In this case whatever you choose (Coke, Dr.Pepper or 7-UP) everything would be free , at zero cost. This means that the opportunity cost in this case is zero, because the drink is free.</span>
Answer:
The risk of recession will most likely cause the company's shareholders to demand a higher return.
Explanation:
If the company loses some customers, more might be attracted to the company. However, if the prices drop, the price might stay low and cause the financial value of stock to drop. Once the stock drops, the entire company loses money along with their stock, which is determined by their profit and loss.
In this scenario, Daniel is <span>satisficing.
</span>According to its definition, to satisfice means '<span>decide on and pursue a course of action that will satisfy the minimum requirements necessary to achieve a particular goal.' So, Daniel is weighing his options and looking for the means which will provide him with the best results possible when it comes to his small shoe manufacturing company.</span>
Answer:
No - FALSE
Explanation:
Scoop Masters Inc. has been charged by Fab Flavors Corp. with stealing Fab Flavors' patented process for making ice cream. After the papers are filed, Scoop Masters begins shredding all documents pertaining to its ice cream-making process. Since no motion has been made requesting production of documents, Scoop Masters has done nothing wrong is a false statement. Scoop Masters Inc. has done really wrong. They have stolen someone else's idea of making a product even without their consent and then without mentioning their name and rights and trademarks. Moreover, they shredded all the proof in order not to be caught by the court in law. They have some serious crime which is totally wrong and unacceptable in all cases at all grounds.
