Answer:
im not 100% but think this is right
Explanation:
the author is making a claim of fact, because he is claiming that provides no economic benefits. im not sure about the second part
When the price of a good rises, consumers buy a smaller quantity because of the substitution effect and the income effect. A change in the relative prices of goods results in change in consumption of that goods and that is denoted as the substitution effect. T<span>he change in purchasing power on the other hand which also result in change in consumption is referred to as the income effect.</span>
Third option I would say goodluck
Answer: C the fallacy of composition.
Explanation:
The Fallacy of Composition is meant to explain the false logic that people apply when they believe that because something is true of a subsection of something, then that thing must be true for the whole thing.
For instance, my phone's batter is made of lithium so my entire phone must be made of lithium.
In this scenario, the logic is that it is good to be involved in military conflict because it favors the nation if it favors a subset (employees in defense) which is flawed because other industries might suffer. This however, represents the fallacy of composition.
