Answer:
Statutory
Explanation:
Statutory law is the concept used to describe written laws passed by legislative bodies. It is law that a government creates by an official legislative process and courts are generally bound by its express terms. Statutes may be repealed by a subsequent legislative act, or if a court of competent jurisdiction finds them unconstitutional.
An automatic response establishing by training to an ordinarily neutral stimulus <span />
According to the central principle of utility, actions are right in proportion, as they tend to promote happiness, and wrong, as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (pain).
<h3>
What is the principle of utility?</h3>
The concept of the principle of utility refers to the standard that determines whether or not any action is acceptable. According to the propensity it shows to either increase or decrease the happiness of the party whose interest is under consideration, or, to put it another way, to support or oppose that happiness.
For instance, the utilitarian viewpoint holds that you should select the flavour of ice cream that will make you feel the happiest if you are making a decision for yourself. If you like chocolate but detest vanilla, go with chocolate for the delight it will provide, and stay away from vanilla because it will make you unhappy.
Learn more about the principle of utility here:
brainly.com/question/14530098
#SPJ4
<u><em>The two countries that are mainly made up of deserts and have a dry arid climate are Saudi Arabia, Oman, and U.A.E.</em></u>
<em>Hope I helped you :)</em>
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.