Hello there and thank you for joining Brainly, first of all. :)
Coming from a perspective of society and civilians, war is always unavoidable. However, there is a fine line between what is known as war and what conflict would be. And conflict, in most terms, is defined as complications. Complications can be resolved without further action, like war. That is, through discussions and government.
Throughout history, we've heard of Crusades, and wars between these two unsettling countries. One, however, is struggling through poverty, and one.. well, lets just say is a powerful force. So, to help explain what the issue is between the two countries - both seemingly claim Jerusalem (or the holy land) as theirs. Multiple minor issues have arose between the times, but most of the conflict seems to be in a strip on Palestine's end called "Gaza". Also known as where the two meet for war. Other areas struggle as well, but to sum this all up, civilians live in places where war is going on. That, right there, is war crime. And war crime on both ends since both did not find a solution to their arguments and disputes. Considering residents of both countries live there, that is also a complete disaster.
So, moving on the question. Because the lack of accurate information has stung everyone, we don't quite know who is the right hand of this argument. Neither do we know under who's ownership the holy land is for sure, and who is sincerely belongs to. However, we can say that the dispute is avoidable under a circumstance. That is, to either 1) Share the holy land, and unite as a state (which would be quite a difficulty considering both are of different religions) 2) Have one take it over (and that won't happen soon, in my view. Both hold is tightly and yearn for it strongly).
Since both are terribly rare solutions, we can come to the conclusion that the conflict is unavoidable. Both believe it is their right to claim it, and all we can say is: May peace be embedded soon. I really hate seeing headlines that speak of more people dying and no one is doing anything about it. It hurts me greatly.
I hope this helps you. Of course, this question is based off of a personal point of view. If this was explained it your class, and your instructor gave a direct answer to this question, you should probably trust your teacher because I'm no politician. (soon to be, though) Please forgive me for any grammatical errors or spelling mistakes.
The Camp David Accord was a peace treaty signed between the Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and the Egyptian President Anwar Al Sadat. The US President Jimmy Carter was also present when the treaty was signed. The treaty was preceded by twelve days of secret negotiaitions between the three at Camp David which is where the treat borrowed its name from. This took place on 17 September 1978.
<span><span><span>The crust: low density silicate rock, 5-70 km thick. There are two distinct types of crust.<span><span>Continental crust is variable in thickness and composition. Thickness ranges from 5-70 km. The composition ranges from mafic to felsic.</span><span>Oceanic crust is uniform in thickness and composition. It is 5-6 km thick and is mafic in composition.</span><span>The differences in thickness and density between continental and oceanic are responsible for the existence of ocean basins due to isostatic balance as the crust floats on the more dense mantle.</span></span></span><span>The mantle: high density, ultramafic silicate rock which can flow when subjected to long duration stresses. The mantle is over 2900 km thick and makes up over 80% of the volume of the Earth. The mantle is not molten!</span></span><span>The core: iron and nickel, liquid outer region with a solid center. The core is just over half the diameter of the Earth.</span></span>
