1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
3 years ago
12

Is conflict unavoidable between Israel and Palestines? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
Sonbull [250]3 years ago
6 0
Hello there and thank you for joining Brainly, first of all. :)

Coming from a perspective of society and civilians, war is always unavoidable. However, there is a fine line between what is known as war and what conflict would be. And conflict, in most terms, is defined as complications. Complications can be resolved without further action, like war. That is, through discussions and government. 

Throughout history, we've heard of Crusades, and wars between these two unsettling countries. One, however, is struggling through poverty, and one.. well, lets just say is a powerful force. So, to help explain what the issue is between the two countries - both seemingly claim Jerusalem (or the holy land) as theirs. Multiple minor issues have arose between the times, but most of the conflict seems to be in a strip on Palestine's end called "Gaza". Also known as where the two meet for war. Other areas struggle as well, but to sum this all up, civilians live in places where war is going on. That, right there, is war crime. And war crime on both ends since both did not find a solution to their arguments and disputes. Considering residents of both countries live there, that is also a complete disaster. 

So, moving on the question. Because the lack of accurate information has stung everyone, we don't quite know who is the right hand of this argument. Neither do we know under who's ownership the holy land is for sure, and who is sincerely belongs to. 
However, we can say that the dispute is avoidable under a circumstance. That is, to either 
1) Share the holy land, and unite as a state (which would be quite a difficulty considering both are of different religions)
2) Have one take it over (and that won't happen soon, in my view. Both hold is tightly and yearn for it strongly). 

Since both are terribly rare solutions, we can come to the conclusion that the conflict is unavoidable. Both believe it is their right to claim it, and all we can say is: May peace be embedded soon. I really hate seeing headlines that speak of more people dying and no one is doing anything about it. It hurts me greatly. 

I hope this helps you. Of course, this question is based off of a personal point of view. If this was explained it your class, and your instructor gave a direct answer to this question, you should probably trust your teacher because I'm no politician. (soon to be, though)
Please forgive me for any grammatical errors or spelling mistakes.

Thank you! :) I enjoyed answering this one.  
You might be interested in
Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence? In a well-developed
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

bixch go to hell an burn bye

3 1
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best describes how imperial power shifted during the last half of the 19th century?
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

Spain declined as a global power, while new players such as the United States emerged as global powers in Latin America and Asia.

Explanation:

I believe this is correct because as Spain declined in power, the US rose. Also following the Spanish-American War in 1898, quickly emerged as new imperial powers in East Asia and in the Pacific Ocean area.

5 0
3 years ago
What was the artist of the price saying about faith
Ivanshal [37]

I believe the answer is The Bible sits in judgement over those who deal with money once, Jesus told his students that Truly I tell you, it is difficult for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Because rich people are exposed more to the feeling of greed and more power to hurt/help other people. This art is created to depicted this very view



7 0
3 years ago
Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address months after the union won the Battle of Gettysburg. What is the tone of Lincol
alisha [4.7K]
Tone is the attitude writers express through words they choose. Note that mood is the specific feelings that the reader gets from the authors text. The tone of Lincolns speech is sorrowful for the lost soldiers and determined to persuade his audience to take action. 

6 0
3 years ago
Which detail from the passage is a fact?
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

your answer is D, The people choose the old man as chief.

Explanation:

hope this helped

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Can someone please check my answer?
    14·1 answer
  • Athenian democracy
    5·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
    12·1 answer
  • What similarity can be drawn between state and national governments?
    10·2 answers
  • Why did church leaders dislike Hutchinson's ideas
    6·2 answers
  • The states that wished for the United States to remain together were
    10·1 answer
  • I KNOW IT'S A LOT BUT I NEED THIS :(
    12·1 answer
  • In the late 1970s, the epa determined that love cv canal, new yorko
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP, WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, THANK YOU, AND 5-STAR RATING!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about plantations is FALSE?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!