Great mineral wealth provided the impetus for the transformation of Etruscan society in the orientalizing period.
How was the orientalizing period developed?
- The Orientalizing period or Orientalizing revolution (also spelled "Orientalising") in the Archaic phase of ancient Greek art is the cultural and art historical period that started in the latter part of the 8th century BC.
- When there was a significant influence from the more developed art of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Ancient Near East. The primary sources were Egypt, Phoenicia, Syria, and Assyria.
- During this time, ornamental motifs and a fascination with animals and monsters emerged in ancient Greek art, which later transferred to Roman and Etruscan art.
- The development of Etruscan society during the orientalizing period was sparked by a significant mineral richness.
To learn more about Etruscan refer to:
brainly.com/question/6758158
#SPJ4
Truthfully speaking there is none. There are plenty of "underprivileged"
people who have risen to success based on their determination. Everyone
has equal access to information because information is free. The only
reason someone would commit a crime is if they were brought up into
believing that that was what was expected of them from society due to
their geographical location, income, color, religion, etc. Those who are
determined to push past the narrative prove that "unequal access to
basic services" and crime are not directly related. Anyone who tells you
otherwise wishes you to remain a slave to the system because they
believe that being poor is where you belong and where you should stay.
The early school of psychology known as functionalism was developed by James.
William James was a psychologist known as the 'father' of functionalism, which is another branch of theory of consciousness. According to functionalism, we store new information daily, and acquire skills, which we may alter and modify depending on the situation, if we want to make our lives easier.
There are a lot of contributions of Rene Descartes. René Descartes conclusive argument was that the nature of the mind which is thinking and non-extended thing is said to be very different from that of the body.
<h3 /><h3> What was Descartes view on the mind-body problem?
</h3>
- A key and efficient lasting legacies of Descartes' philosophy is his work was that mind and body are really different. His thesis called “mind-body dualism.”
He was known to be the man who invented analytical geometry and brought about skepticism as a key part of the scientific method.
His conclusive argument was that the nature of the mind which is thinking and non-extended thing is said to be very different from that of the body and that their function is not the same.
Learn more about Rene Descartes from
brainly.com/question/838565
Answer:
The implications of Radical Skepticism for knowledge and for the rest of life is described below in details.
Explanation:
Radical skepticism is the thoughtful condition that experience is most likely unattainable. Radical skeptics believe that uncertainty endures as to the truthfulness of every faith and that assurance is therefore never explained. The cause for this is that accurately represented, radical skepticism is expected to be nonsense, in that it presents deep anxiety in our epistemological theories.
