Answer:
Both are true statements
Explanation:
1st Statement: Changes in the age composition of the labor force will affect the natural rate of unemployment, Yes i agree with this and the example given is a typical scenario for this, Most employers always have age limit or set age barrier when recruiting e.g The clause of must not be more than 26yrs of age, what if the number of youthful workers which applies for these kind of jobs are more than 26 years, it just automatically increases the rate of unemployment, most companies dont want to employ 30+ years of age, such age requirement are always rear and it will be tied to an experience that is needed. so the above statement is true.
2nd statement: An increase in minimum wage can also affect cyclical unemployment, As most companies might not be able afford to make such increase which will can definitely increase cyclical unemployment. So this is tied to the income and affordability of some organizations, so organizations might even sack some to afford the increase in minimum wage , with this, the rate of unemployment has increased, So yes i agree that this statement is true.
Answer: c. the economic freedom rating of the United States fell and the growth of real GDP was less rapid than that of recent decades.
Explanation: The economic freedom rating of the United States in the first decade of the 21st century fell below the what was obtainable in the previous decade. Likewise, the growth of real GDP during this period was less rapid than it was previously
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>reflexivity </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>Reflexivity</em><em> is determined as an act of "self-reference" where an individuals action or examination signifies the entity that is instigating the examination or action. In other words, reflexivity refers to the fact that how much an individual is intended to do a specific thing while being comfortable even if that specific thing is being moulded or changed.</em>
<em>The question above describes "reflexivity".</em>
The correct answer would be, Extortion.
He threatened to release them to the competition if he was not paid. George should place this incident in the category of Extortion.
Explanation:
When someone forcefully obtain something, especially money, from someone, This is called as Extortion. Extortion is done through threatening the person or blackmailing him. The person involved in extortion may threat or blackmail the person to release his confidential personal belongings to the public if he is not paid desirably.
So in the given question, when a former employee of George's firm hacked the sensitive data of the client, and threatened George to release the Client's confidential details in public if he is not paid, is a clear example of Extortion.
Learn more about Blackmailing or Extortion at:
brainly.com/question/13200473
#LearnWithBrainly
