You can make 9 into a fraction with the denominator of 56.
8/9= 48/56 (multiply both by 6)
Just add three to the numerator. We can round 48 to 50, so:
50/56+3/56= 53/56 That would be the estimation.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
Answer: Have you tried to restart the app or browser? How long ago did you purchase it? If it was today or yesterday you may need to wait a bit.
Explanation: It takes time for the transaction to go through. Trust me, my mom works at a bank.
The statement that applies are the rental of ant kayak equipment you need the wages that you forgo by going kayaking and the fee for accessing the river in a national park
Explanation:
The true cost for going to a particular place includes all that costs that are included from moving to a place that includes all the wages and the vehicle cost
Here the opportunity costs includes the fee to go to the national park by crossing the river and the amount that is needed to be spent on the equipment and the wages that must be forgo by going to kayaking all these statements best includes the true costs of going to kayaking
Answer:
STOCKS
Explanation:
US government bond is a government security, therefore the government print more money to pay those who invest in it.
In addition bondholders are creditors of a corporation.
Stockholders, are part owners of a company. In case of bankruptcy, bondholders are given priority.
Savings accounts are protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) provisions.
Money market accounts are a safe investment because they are insured by the FDIC.
Therefore the investment option that has the highest risk is stocks.
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
