<em>WHAT</em><em> </em><em>DO</em><em> </em><em>U</em><em> </em><em>Mea</em><em>n</em><em>?</em><em>?</em><em>?</em>
<em>Dont</em><em> </em><em>waste</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>points</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>such</em><em> </em><em>unnecessar</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>things</em><em>.</em>
<h2>
<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em> </em><em>understand</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em></h2>
Answer:
10,800
Step-by-step explanation:
you would multiply 1450 by 3 witch is 4350 then multiply that answer by to for the second year witch is 8700 then u take the price of ur books witch is 350 and multiply that by 3 witch is 1050 then multiply 1050 by 2 witch is 2100 then u add 8700 and 2100 and that gives u 10800
Answer:
2 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
15 miles - 9 miles = 6 miles
12 laps / 6 miles = 2 miles
In the question, Michael's survey yielded a correlation of r = 0.12 which is a weak positive correlation. Because the correlation is a weak correlation, he can not conclude that students with poor grades did not score as many points as those with good grades, and the students with poor grades caused the team to score fewer points while on the court.
Therefore, <span>Michael
does not have a good argument because the info he used shows a weak
positive correlation, which does not imply causation.</span>
Answer:
$1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
This would be solved using a simultaneous equation
let tacos = t
drink = d
3t + d = 7 -- eqn 1
2t + 2d = 8 -- eqn 2
Multiply equation 1 by 2 to derive equation 3
6t + 2d = 14 eqn 3
Substract equation 2 from equation 3
6t + 2d = 14 -- eqn 3
-
2t + 2d = 8 -- eqn 2
= 4t = 6
solve for t
6/4 = 1.5
= $1.5