Answer:
(x-6) (2x+1)
Step-by-step explanation:
1) move everything over to the left side, so subtract 11x and 6.
2x^2 -11x - 6 = 0
2)multiply 2(a term) with -6 (c term)
x^2 -11x -12
3) factor and find what multiples to -12 and adds up to -11. in this case its -12 and positive 1
(x-12) (x+1)
4) divide -12 and 1 by the original a term (2)
(x-6) (x+1/2)
5) move the denominator of 2 over to the x.
(x-6) (2x+1)
"A medical study is conducted to determine which migraine treatment, A or B, provides faster relief. " For the question "Are the conditions for inference met?" we say No, the 10% condition is not met. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
a confidence interval?</h3>
Generally, the confidence interval is simply defined as a predetermined interval across which some parameter has a certain chance of falling
In conclusion, with a resultant confidence interval of; confidence interval ( -8.373, -3.627) For the hypothesis test question "Are the inference requirements met?" Our company is certain that the 10% threshold has not been reached.
Read more about confidence interval
brainly.com/question/24131141
#SPJ1
30 people don't like banana peppers on their pizza because 25 people like only pepperoni, but 5 people don't like either pepperoni or banana peppers.
Answer:
a

b
The nutritionist does not have sufficient evidence to reject the writers claim
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is 
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation 
The level of significance is 
Now the
Null Hypothesis is 
Alternative Hypothesis is 
generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as



For a significance level of 0.05 and 19 degrees of freedom, the critical value for the t-test is 2.093. This is obtain from the t-distribution table
The test statistic is mathematically evaluated as

substituting values


Since the test statistic is below the critical value then the Null hypothesis can not be rejected
So we can conclude that the nutritionist does not have sufficient evidence to reject the writers claim