Conservative justices interpret the constitution by

History

2 answers:

mafiozo [28]2 years ago

8 0

Conservative judges interpret the constitution differently than liberal judges.

Liberal judges usually interpret the Constitution as an evolving document that adapts to modern times.

Conservatives judges, on the other hand, have a more originalist interpretation, this means that they believe the interpreter of the Constitution should be faithful to it and interpret it the way the original writers meant at the time. They don’t believe in the adaptation of the Constitution to the new times because they think this means the interpreter would change the interpretation of the original text.

tekilochka [14]2 years ago

3 0

It focuses on its literal wording

You might be interested in

Any help would be great. Thanks.

VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

Rome's Rise, Rule, and Fall

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS :)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which tribe signed away most of its lands in illinois after being harassed by anglo settlers in 1819?

noname [10]

<span>Kickapoo tribe signed most of its land after being harassed by anglo settlers in 1819.</span>

5 0

2 years ago

What rights did the guarantee for Americans?

White raven [17]

The five freedoms it protects: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. Together, these five guaranteed freedoms make the people of the United States of America the freest in the world. ... If you're in the U.S., you have freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A historian is trying to understand the events that led up to the terrorist attacks on New York City's World Trade Center on Sep

Anna [14]

<span>the correct response would be that the historian is using "research skills", since he must find out the exact order of events. </span>

4 0

3 years ago

This excerpt demonstrates that the framers of the U.S. Constitution intended the document:

ANTONII [103]

Answer:

Constitutional amendments.

Explanation:

The first method authorizes Congress, "whenever two-thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary", to propose Constitutional amendments. ... It moreover equally enables the General and the State Governments to originate the amendment of errors, as they may be pointed out by the experience on one side, or on the other.

3 0

2 years ago