If a reform of the tax laws encourages greater saving, the result would be

J.P. Morgan Chase & Company wanted to hire the children of prominent Chinese officials. Considering legal and ethical standa

Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

The interviewer should structure the interview in a way that helps him find out:

Whether the applicants hold parallel job positions in China, and if they do, whether those parallel positions conflict with corporate standards, and general federal law.
Whether the applicants understand the basics of US ethical standards (and J.P. Morgan standards), and US law so that they have a general and reasonable idea of what actions are forbbiden under American codes.
Whether the applicants itend to engage in financial transactions with Chinese officials, and whether the money that would be used would come from J.P. Morgan or not.
This might sound overboard, but as the applicants come from a country that is known to engage in spying, intellectual property stealing, and general involvement with internal issues in other countries, the interviewer should try to ask probing questions to find out if the applicants are some sort of spies or not.

7 0

3 years ago

A contractual arrangement between a parent company and an individual or firm that allows the latter to operate a certain type of

Serhud [2]

Answer:

Franchising

Explanation:

Franchising is defined as the contract that exists between a parent company (franchisor) and other firms (franchisee) in which an operating licence is given to the franchisee.

The franchisor gives access to use of their brand and also provides support and training to the franchisee.

Franchisee in turn gives an agreed amount of profit to the franchisor for using their brand.

An established name and specific rules of operation is agreed upon in the contract.

4 0

3 years ago

Sunland Co. uses the retail inventory method. The following information is available for the current year. Cost Retail Beginning

pantera1 [17]

Answer:

Sunland Co.

The calculation of the cost ratio should be based on cost and retail of $1,581,000 and $2,288,500 respectively.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Cost Retail Cost to Retail Ratio

Beginning inventory $ 318,000 $494,000

Purchases 1,240,000 1,720,000

Freight-in 23,000 —

Employee discounts — 8,500

Net markups — 66,000

Goods available for sale $1,581,000 $2,288,500 69.08%

Less:

Net markdowns — 86,000

Sales revenue — 1,620,000

Estimated ending Inventory at retail $582,500

Estimated ending Inventory

at cost $402,391 ($582,500 * 69.08%)

Calculation of the cost ratio = $1,581,000/$2,288,500 * 100 = 69.08%

3 0

2 years ago

Benson and Orton are partners who share income in the ratio of 2:3 and have capital balances of $60,000 and $40,000, respectivel

hjlf

Answer:

$48,800

Explanation:

Ratio = 2:3

Total investment:

= Benson capital + Orton capital + Ramsey capital

= $60,000 + $40,000 + $20,000

= $120,000

Total Equity of Ramsey:

= 40% of Total investment

= 0.4 × $120,000

= $48,000

Old partners contribution:

= Equity of Ramsey - Ramsey capital

= $48,000 - $20,000

= $28,000

Benson’s capital balance after admitting Ramsey:

= Benson’s capital - Old partners contribution(2 ÷ 5)

= $60,000 - [$28,000 × (2 ÷ 5)]

= $60,000 - $11,200

= $48,800

6 0

3 years ago

If the government changes taxes without changing government spending to eliminate the recessionary gap, will the minimum require

Shalnov [3]

Answer:

Explanation:

If the government changes taxes without changing government spending to eliminate the recessionary gap, will the minimum required change in taxes be greater than, smaller than, or equal to the minimum required change in government spending?

The minimum required change in taxes will be greater than that of the minimum required change in government spending

tax multiplier (mpc/mps = 0/8/0.2=0.4) is smaller than the government spending multiplier (1/mps= 1/.2=5) because of the initial increase in disposable income caused by the decrease in income tax will be saved rather than spent

3 0

3 years ago