1 5/8
Trust me :)
If it's wrong then sue me instead :D
After demonstrating the procedure by algebraic means, the expression
<em>is equivalent to</em>
.
In this question we proceed to <em>simplify</em>
by <em>algebraic</em> means into a <em>single</em> <em>radical</em> expression when possible, whose procedure is shown below and explained by appropriate definitions and theorems:
-
Given. -
Commutative property/ Associative property. -
Definition of cubic root/
/Result
After demonstrating the procedure by algebraic means, the expression
<em>is equivalent to</em>
.
To learn more on radical expressions, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/1810591
Notice how points T and Z are vertically aligned, or vertically lined up. This is where the graph fails the vertical line test.
The input x = 2 leads to the outputs y = 3 and y = 5 (which are the y coordinates of points Z and T in that order).
A function is only possible when any given input leads to <u>exactly one</u> output only. It would be like saying "the conversion function from Celsius to Fahrenheit has 0 degrees C convert to both 32 degrees F and 50 degrees F at the same time". But such a statement makes no sense and it's not useful. So this is one example of why having one output makes sense for a function.
In short, we need one output for any given input. But the input x = 2 leads to more than one output. That's why we don't have a function.
Theres an app called slader. If you look up what your school book is it will give you all the answers