1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
3 years ago
10

Match the legal terms with their definitions.

Law
1 answer:
PolarNik [594]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a is 3.

b is 1.

c is 2.

explanation:

Copyright- legal ownership of creative work.

Infringement- an act of violating the legal rights of the creator or other copyright holder of creative work.

Fair use- an exception to copyright that allows limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the owner.

You might be interested in
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
Discuss the role of judicial review in relation to administrative agencies.
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer: First, courts will examine the statutory authority for an agency's action and will invalidate agency choices that exceed these limits. In addition, a court may examine an agency's discretionary decisions, or discrete actions with legal consequences for the public.

8 0
3 years ago
Is it illegal to transport a pet in the back of an open pick up truck
Levart [38]

Answer:

It depends on where you are.

Explanation:

in some states and countrys the answer is yes, you can transport a pet in the back of an open pickup truck. Others will say no, you can not. For many good reasons.

7 0
2 years ago
Help plzzzzzzzzz
andre [41]

Answer:

cause of the job he is doing

5 0
3 years ago
1. Assume that the Nebraska legislature passes a law providing that all crimes in Nebraska are to be tried by a six-member jury.
saul85 [17]

The size of a jury in charge of a criminal case depends on the weight of the criminal case. A capital criminal case according to the sixth amendment should be tried by a twelve-member jury. In case of misdemeanors, a six-member jury suffices. This is based on the Florida law of 1967 first applied in the Williams v. Florida case of 1970.

In a six-member jury, conviction has to be unanimous i.e all of the six members must approve the conviction before it is done. It is only in a twelve-member jury that conviction does not necessarily have to be unanimous.

The law made by the Nebraska legislature is unconstitutional because it allows all crimes, whether misdemeanor or felony, to be tried by a six-member jury. It also goes against the law of unanimous conviction by a six-member jury.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many people die every day in the US from alcohol-related vehicle crashes?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the worst thing one person can do in order to get the longest sentence in prison?
    8·2 answers
  • Can anyone explain what i need to look forward to for high school and what i need to do if i want to be a traffic lawer? If you
    9·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP QUICK!!! In 100 or more words, tell of the Supreme Court's responsibility in interpreting the Constitution -- in other
    11·1 answer
  • The highest authority in the United States is the
    8·2 answers
  • Consider systematic discrimination, contextual discrimination, institutional and individual acts of discrimination. Which do you
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following most accurately describes the effect of the statute?
    10·1 answer
  • I need to make a bill that I want to be passed as a law for my Government class. My school is very conservative. I just need an
    8·1 answer
  • The parole officer has more contact and responsibility to the judge than the probation officer does.
    13·1 answer
  • What is NOT a way to lower your risk of drowsy driving?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!