1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saveliy_v [14]
4 years ago
11

The parents die and the three children want to purchase the home with the stipulation that the last child to survive will have 1

00% ownership of the house. How should they take title to facilitate this?
Law
1 answer:
beks73 [17]4 years ago
4 0

Answer and explanation:

In order to facilitate this legal process, and considering the situation presented, the best option would be a <u>joint tenancy</u>. <u>Joint tenancy</u> is a legal proccedure that indicates that when there is more than one owner of a property, all of them have equal rights on said place. In this case joint tenancy claims survivorship rights so that the remaining child will increase their percentage ownership.

You might be interested in
The legal ability to enter into a binding agreement is known as ________.
Annette [7]

Answer:

consideration. capacity.

Explanation:

the legal ability to enter into a binding agreement. people suffering from mental illness, intoxicated persons, those under the age of majority do not have. capacity.

8 0
3 years ago
What did the french writer alexis de tocqueville call america
olasank [31]

Answer:

As “Democracy in America” revealed, Tocqueville believed that equality was the great political and social idea of his era, and he thought that the United States offered the most advanced example of equality in action




HOPE THIS HELPS, HAVE A GREAT DAY!!~

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Alcohol drinkers under 21 years of age are at an especially high risk for __________.
LenKa [72]
Binge drinking‍♀️ hope I helped
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Long-arm statutes: a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. b. have been ruled unconstitutional
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

<h3>a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.</h3>

Explanation:

  • Long-arm statutes are laws that allow state courts to acquire automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. The courts can apprehend an out-of-state defendant based on certain actions which have connections with the concerned state.
  • The provisions of a long-arm statute normally grants a state court the right to jurisdiction over a non-state domicile if the individual has minimum connection within the state's court jurisdiction.  
4 0
3 years ago
Let us check how well you have mastered the lessons in this module.
Margarita [4]

Answer:

  1. D. survey
  2. B. executive summary
  3. C. recommendations
  4. D. references/ bibliography
  5. C. quantitative
  6. a.primary
  7. c.references
  8. primary
  9. b.bar graph
  10. c.pictograph.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • For laws against shoplifting, pick at least one of the four grounds for justification—legal moralism, the harm principle, legal
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Bill of Rights impact the ratification of the Constitution?
    11·1 answer
  • In an)<br> primary, people vote directly for a candidate.
    13·1 answer
  • Who decides what is evidence is relevant and admissible according to federal evidence rules?
    7·1 answer
  • The use of alcohol can cause____
    15·2 answers
  • What type of sources should you read first, according to the GATHER model
    11·1 answer
  • Wairimu aged 17 years entered into an agreement with Patel in which Wairimu agreed to supply Patel with old Jerry cans for recyc
    8·1 answer
  • Laws created by Texas legislature are applied by police officers and courts. What is this called?
    6·1 answer
  • (HELP IM ON A TIMER, 3 MINUTES LEFT) What are some ways the House of Representatives turn a bill into a law after the president
    11·1 answer
  • The net effect of the supreme court decisions in mcculloch v. Maryland and gibbons v. Ogden was.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!