1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saveliy_v [14]
3 years ago
11

The parents die and the three children want to purchase the home with the stipulation that the last child to survive will have 1

00% ownership of the house. How should they take title to facilitate this?
Law
1 answer:
beks73 [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer and explanation:

In order to facilitate this legal process, and considering the situation presented, the best option would be a <u>joint tenancy</u>. <u>Joint tenancy</u> is a legal proccedure that indicates that when there is more than one owner of a property, all of them have equal rights on said place. In this case joint tenancy claims survivorship rights so that the remaining child will increase their percentage ownership.

You might be interested in
What is 1trillion? please answer me​
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

1,000,000,000,000

Explanation:

A trillion is 1,000,000,000,000, also known as 10 to the 12th power, or one million million. It's such a large number it's hard to get your head around it, so sometimes trillion just means “wow, a lot.”

4 0
3 years ago
When it is believed that a law treats people differently because of their race, national origin or religion, the courts treat th
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

it is a test of strict scrutiny

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Hellmo bc I feel like it <br> ( I’ll do more of these?
aniked [119]
Hellmo, love it yes do more of these
6 0
3 years ago
What are the three natural rights that Locke lists at the end of this excerpT
mylen [45]

Answer:

Life, Liberty, and PropertyUNIT 10.2| Enlightenment, Revolution, and Nationalism.

6 0
3 years ago
b. Belva is cheated when she buys a car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and te
shtirl [24]

Answer:

A good lawyer might get Belva off with a manslaughter charge. What she did was pre-meditated but she didn't intend to kill Fast Eddie. Just his car. Like most bad plans, she hadn't considered the possibility of unintended consequences.  A good prosecutor could probably put her away for a long time. She definitely pursued Fast Eddie with intentions of doing harm. Killing him might not have been the plan, but that's what the plan ultimately resulted in.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which illustrates the proper outline for a judge's opinion on a case?
    11·1 answer
  • Taco bell implied contract
    8·1 answer
  • Kris contracts to work exclusively for Local Company during the month of May for $5,000. On April 15 Local cancels the contract.
    7·1 answer
  • In the legal system, compliance is the action of following applicable laws and rules and regulations. Which of the following pro
    6·1 answer
  • In court, what would a prosecutor need to document for evidence to be admitted?
    8·1 answer
  • A scientific theory can be modified. do you agree or disagree provide evidence a long thank you!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Pls hurry i will mark the brainliest has to be right 20 points!!
    5·1 answer
  • 8. What qualifies as a projected bloodstain?
    6·1 answer
  • the US presidential election is determined by the people and which of the following? A.) the senate B.) the supreme court C.) th
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the ways courts handle contracts for which a required license is missing.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!