Answer:
No. The classified document should not be shared with Carlos
Explanation:
Based on the information given the classified document should not be shared with Carlos because Carlos is not part of the Project X team and he does not have a "need-to-know" secondlly no one else is supposed to be given automatic access to the Secret document in my possession related to Project X or the classified information solely because the person is my superior or because of the person rank, position or security clearance.
Answer:
Sustainable Growth Rate: 2.5%
Explanation:
Sustainable growth rate is calculated by multiplying return on equity with retention ratio.
Logic behind above is that whatever portion of net profit is retained by the Company, is used in the Company's operations, which earns certain percentage of equity known as return on equity. By multiplying both return on equity with retention ratio, we assume that the practice will continue for foreseeable future and the Company will continue to grow at the calculated growth rate.
Growth rate = Retention ratio * return on equity
Retention ratio = 50%
Return on equity = Net profit available for distribution / Opening equity
Return on Equity = (25,000 * 10%) / 50,000
Return on Equity = 5%
Growth Rate = 5% * 50%
Growth Rate = 2.5%
Answer:
Therefore government purchases is $300 million
Explanation:
In this case, GDP is the sum of consumption, investment, and government purchases. To calculate the value of consumption we use the formula:
CC + II + GG = Y
GG = Y - CC - II
Where:
government purchases = GG
taxes minus transfer payments (TT) = $260 million
consumption (CC) = $300 million
investment (II) = $300 million
Y = country GDP = $800 million
GG = Y - CC - II
Substituting:
GG = $800 million - $300 milllion - $300 million
GG = $200 million
Therefore government purchases is $300 million
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
By producing a product with a lower opportunity cost
Explanation:
Given that the law of comparative advantage states that a nation is better off when it produces goods and services for which it has a comparative advantage.
To obtain a comparative advantage means "By producing a product with a lower opportunity cost."
This implies that while many nations can produce the same products, a particular nation will have the comparative advantage over other nations if its opportunity cost of producing that specific product is quite lower compared to other nations that ks capable of producing the same product.
