Answer:
A firm's optimal capital structure occurs where WACC is minimized and stock price is maximized.
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
Optimal capital structure exists where the market value of a firm is maximum and WACC is minimum. Optimal capital structure relates to net income approach to capital structure.
Answer:
Effect on income= $0
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
He is currently grooming 120 dogs per week. If instead of grooming 120 dogs, he grooms 121 dogs, he will add $65.65 to his costs and $65.65 to his revenues.
Contribution margin per dog= selling price - unitary variable cost
Contribution margin per dog= 65.65 - 65.65= 0
Effect on income= 0*1= $0
Answer:
Adverse possession.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Lisa lives next to a vacant plot that belongs to Carol. Carol has never visited the plot in the last 20 years during which period, Lisa has taken care of it by fencing the plot and mowing the grass. If this continues, Lisa will be able to claim ownership of land based on adverse possession.
In Real estate law, Adverse possession is a legal principle which allows a non-owner individual to possess a piece of land and gain title with the exclusion of the real owner, after a certain period of time.
However, the non-owner occupant must proof to the court of law meets the following requirements;
1. Continuous.
2. Hostile.
3. Open.
4. Actual.
5. Exclusive.
Answer:
The correct answer is e. competitor-oriented pricing
.
Explanation:
A competition-oriented pricing strategy means that the pricing decision corresponds to the consumer's own issues, which influences their purchase decision. Diane's decision to lower her cupcakes and equalize the price of CC's Bakery only supposes the materialization of a strategy that seeks to discard the price as a determining factor in the sales process and assign it to other variables such as attention, quality, etc.
Answer:
(D) are likely liable under the theory of compelled self-publication.
Explanation:
Under the defamation cause of action, courts protect an individual's interest in his reputation by holding liable the maker of false statements ( be it the previous employer) that damage the individual(employee)'s reputation.
