1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ValentinkaMS [17]
3 years ago
13

Which industry benefited most from the construction of railroads in the post Civil war period?

History
2 answers:
Natasha_Volkova [10]3 years ago
7 0
C. Steel becuase it was mostly steel used for the railroads and it showed how strong and sturdy steel was expanding the market for steel
Nastasia [14]3 years ago
3 0
A. Agriculture? Cuz farmers were able to transport crops cheaper faster farther and in greater amounts without them spoiling.
You might be interested in
Why do terrorists attack?
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

ok  dude not to be mean or anything but its a terrorist? look up the def dude u know what whatever ima just tell u

Explanation:

because a terrorist is a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

5 0
1 year ago
Movement Throughout the map, arrows are used to show the progress of the Japanese military as it invaded neighboring Asian count
oee [108]

Answer:

The download does not open. Please upload again and I will answer for you. Thank you :)

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Fog of war?​
dusya [7]

iş the uncertainty in situational awareness experienced by participants in military operations. fog war simulates the unknowns of the battlefield

5 0
3 years ago
What is the importance of the twenty-sixth amendment
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

The importance is the privilege to the right to vote and to work in the army.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In pre-1947 india, the vaishya caste attempted sanskritization—an improvement of their position in the caste rankings—by convert
    5·1 answer
  • The preamble to the bill of rights says that government is more effective when
    9·1 answer
  • Who benefited most of the silk road east west or everyone
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following scientists studied physics in Europe?​
    14·1 answer
  • Which civilization created an accurate calendar between A.D. 300 and A.D. 900? the Incas the Aztecs the Mayas the Cuzco
    7·2 answers
  • Which Allied leader is described below? His peace plan for World War I was called the Fourteen Points. He believed Germany had t
    6·1 answer
  • 4. ¿Cómo sorprendió el general Aníbal a los romanos?
    5·1 answer
  • Under Napoleon, what form of government did France have?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the issue of States’ Rights? Give an example of an issue dealing with States’ Rights
    5·1 answer
  • Використовуючи такі слова, як :президент,військо,українська мова ,державна символіка ,складіть ессе на тему:"Третья спроса утвер
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!