1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goblinko [34]
3 years ago
14

The probabilities that stock A will rise in price is 0.59 and that stock B will rise in price is 0.41. Further, if stock B rises

in price, the probability that stock A will also rise in price is 0.61. a. What is the probability that at least one of the stocks will rise in price.b. Are events A and B mutually exclusive? i. Yes because P(A | B) = P(A).ii. Yes because P(A ∩ B) = 0.iii. No because P(A | B) ≠ P(A).iv. No because P(A ∩ B) ≠ 0.c. Are events A and B independent? i. Yes because P(A | B) = P(A).ii.Yes because P(A ∩ B) = 0.iii.No because P(A | B) ≠ P(A).iv.No because P(A ∩ B) ≠ 0.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Reil [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1) 0.75

2) No, the 2 events are not mutually exclusive because P(A&B) ≠ 0

3)The 2 events are not independent because P(A | B) ≠ P(A).

Step-by-step explanation:

1) P(A) = 0.59 and P(B) = 0.41

Thus; to find the probability that at least one of the stocks will rise in price;

P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A&B)

Now, we know that if B rises in price, the probability that A will also rise is 0.61 i.e P(A|B) = 0.61

Hence;P(A & B) = P(A|B) x P(B) =0.61 x 0. 41 = 0.25

So P(A or B) = 0.59 + 0.41 - 0.25 = 0.75

B) we want to find out if events A and B are mutually exclusive ;

P(A|B) = P(A&B)/P(B), For the events to be mutually exclusive, P(A&B) has to be zero. Since P(A&B) ≠ 0,the 2 events are not mutually exclusive.

C) Since P(A|B) = 0.61 and P(A) is 0.59. Thus, P(A | B) ≠ P(A).

So, therefore the 2 events are not independent.

You might be interested in
F(x)=6x-18 sub in f(x/3), f(x)/3
arlik [135]

These are two separate problems: in the first we will have to substitute in a new value for x into the original equation and in the second we will manipulate the preexisting equation for f(x).

To begin, we will sub in f(x/3). To do this, we will substitute each variable x in the equation (in this case there is only one) with x/3, and then simplify the resulting equation.

f(x) = 6x - 18

f(x/3) = 6(x/3) - 18

To simplify, we should distribute the 6 on the right side of the equation.

f(x/3) = 6x/3 - 18

Now, we can divide the first term on the right side to finalize our simplification.

f(x/3) = 2x -18

Secondly, we are asked to find f(x)/3. To do this, we will take our original value for f(x), and then simplify divide that entire function by 3.

f(x) = 6x - 18

f(x)/3 = (6x-18)/3

This means that we must divide each term of the binomial by 3, so we are really computing

f(x)/3 = 6x/3 - 18/3

We can simplify by dividing both of the terms.

f(x)/3 = 2x - 6

Therefore, your answer is that f(x/3) = 2x - 18, but f(x)/3 = 2x - 6. It is important to recognize that these are two similar, yet different, answers.

Hope this helps!


8 0
3 years ago
Part A: The Sun produces 3.9 ⋅ 1033 ergs of radiant energy per second. How many ergs of radiant energy does the Sun produce in 3
Nuetrik [128]

5914 1404 393

Answer:

  A) 1.3×10^37 ergs

  B) 1.435×10^3 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

A) The amount of energy will be the product of the energy rate and time:

  (3.9×10^33 ergs/s)×(3.25×10^3 s) =12.675×10^(33+3) ergs

  = 1.2675×10^(1+36) ergs

  = 1.2675×10^37 ergs ≈ 1.3×10^37 ergs

The mantissa of the result is the product 3.9×3.25, adjusted to have one digit left of the decimal point. The exponent of the result is the sum of the exponents of the factors, adjusted by 1 to match the adjustment in the mantissa.

The final value should be rounded to 2 significant figures, reflecting the precision of the sun's energy production.

__

B) A millimeter is a small fraction of an inch. 10^-3 mm is a small fraction of the width of a human hair, so 1.435×10^-3 mm is not a reasonable estimate of the distance between railroad tracks.

On the other hand, 1.435×10^3 mm is 1.435 m, almost 56.5 inches. This is a much more reasonable measurement of the distance between railroad rails.

  1.435×10^3 mm is more reasonable

8 0
3 years ago
Simple easy question please help ASAP will mark brainliest! Hector is competing in a 42- mile bicycle race. He has already compl
olganol [36]

Answer and Explanation: The answer and explanation is in the image.

4 0
2 years ago
Figure lmno is a parrellelogram<br> The sum of measures of angles l and m is
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

l+m = 180°{being co-interior angle}

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
There is a special offer at the book shop.
N76 [4]

price of 3Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A 3ft bird stands on top of a 26ft building. Looking down at an angle of 60°.
    5·1 answer
  • What’s the slope of the line of (5,2) and (8,7)
    10·1 answer
  • Translate each sentence into a formula
    9·1 answer
  • Find (3 × 10^4) + (7 × 10^2) in scientific form.
    10·2 answers
  • Which property is illustrated by 2(2x+4)=4x+8
    10·1 answer
  • Cross sections are generally related to the parts of the figures from which they are formed. Make sure to explain why it is True
    8·2 answers
  • HELP ME PLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS URGENTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
    5·1 answer
  • I Ethan uses ZB fl oz of sparkling water, how much orange juice wil he use and what will be the total
    11·1 answer
  • What is the value of x in the equation shown below?<br> x3 + 1 = 9
    9·2 answers
  • What algebraic inequality can be used to represent the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!