These are two separate problems: in the first we will have to substitute in a new value for x into the original equation and in the second we will manipulate the preexisting equation for f(x).
To begin, we will sub in f(x/3). To do this, we will substitute each variable x in the equation (in this case there is only one) with x/3, and then simplify the resulting equation.
f(x) = 6x - 18
f(x/3) = 6(x/3) - 18
To simplify, we should distribute the 6 on the right side of the equation.
f(x/3) = 6x/3 - 18
Now, we can divide the first term on the right side to finalize our simplification.
f(x/3) = 2x -18
Secondly, we are asked to find f(x)/3. To do this, we will take our original value for f(x), and then simplify divide that entire function by 3.
f(x) = 6x - 18
f(x)/3 = (6x-18)/3
This means that we must divide each term of the binomial by 3, so we are really computing
f(x)/3 = 6x/3 - 18/3
We can simplify by dividing both of the terms.
f(x)/3 = 2x - 6
Therefore, your answer is that f(x/3) = 2x - 18, but f(x)/3 = 2x - 6. It is important to recognize that these are two similar, yet different, answers.
Hope this helps!
5914 1404 393
Answer:
A) 1.3×10^37 ergs
B) 1.435×10^3 mm
Step-by-step explanation:
A) The amount of energy will be the product of the energy rate and time:
(3.9×10^33 ergs/s)×(3.25×10^3 s) =12.675×10^(33+3) ergs
= 1.2675×10^(1+36) ergs
= 1.2675×10^37 ergs ≈ 1.3×10^37 ergs
The mantissa of the result is the product 3.9×3.25, adjusted to have one digit left of the decimal point. The exponent of the result is the sum of the exponents of the factors, adjusted by 1 to match the adjustment in the mantissa.
The final value should be rounded to 2 significant figures, reflecting the precision of the sun's energy production.
__
B) A millimeter is a small fraction of an inch. 10^-3 mm is a small fraction of the width of a human hair, so 1.435×10^-3 mm is not a reasonable estimate of the distance between railroad tracks.
On the other hand, 1.435×10^3 mm is 1.435 m, almost 56.5 inches. This is a much more reasonable measurement of the distance between railroad rails.
1.435×10^3 mm is more reasonable
Answer and Explanation: The answer and explanation is in the image.
Answer:
l+m = 180°{being co-interior angle}
Step-by-step explanation:
price of 3Step-by-step explanation: