The answer to this question is the Generalized Anxiety Disorder. The Generalized anxiety disorder is a kind of disorder where an individual worries on life events that they deal to it as too exaggerated but it seems that there is nothing to worry about. These individuals worry about matters on health, money, family, office / work, and other life situations.
It depends a big part of the impact was there farming and cultivating part
The philosophical term “a priory” was popularized by
Immanuel Kant and it concerns epistemology, philosophy dealing with the theory
of knowledge. A priory actually refers to something that can be deduced by
reason alone, while the "a posteriori" is something that cannot be known by reason
alone like empirical facts.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
The answer is c you are welcome
