B. The streamers were red gashes cut across the sky.
<span>Some criticisms of Carl Roger's theory are:
- He considers that parents must show unconditional approval to their children, however, there are children with very harmful behaviors to whom approval cannot be shown.
- His concept of human nature is that it always tends to good and healthy, and it has been proven that this is not always the case.
- Considers that a relationship of unconditional positive respect should be shown in the therapeutic relationship, but there has been a lot of criticism if the therapists can or should do it in all cases. <span>For example, with very aggressive patients.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Answer:
nature , nurture
Explanation:
The long held debate of nature vs nurture, arises from ancient philosopers and continues in the present. In the yaer of 1869 the issue was named "Nature versus Nurture" by Englishmen Francis Galton.
It was a time where the genotypes and clues of the existence of the DNA were emerging, and people where to observe if genetics shaped personality- or if in the contrary the cultural, social, and educational experiencies will be more important in personality formation.
There exists today a widespread consensus that, to certain degree, there will be always some natural components like the eye color and color of skin, that will however after birth be shaped by environmental factors and the lifestyle.
In the case of other internal characteristics, internal and external forces will shape as well.
Answer:
How invisible particles can be observed in outer space. ... We call this invisible mass dark matter since it cannot reflect light. Gravitational effects are only way we can detect its presence.
