<span>
<span>The
liability created by receiving cash before providing the service or
delivering the goods in question is called unearned revenue. In this case, the entity providing the
goods/services records this transaction as revenue that has been generated
but in real sense, the seller remains with the liability until after the actual delivery
of the goods/services. The purpose of this practice can be advantageous to
the seller in certain situations such as easing the burden of paying interest
on debts.</span></span>
I interviewed a local talent management firm's about her business problem that they currently experienced.
Currently, they faced problem from the power of social media. In the past, many artists relied on talent management firm to gain exposure, but today, they can find that exposure through social media. (i.e : youtube, facebook)
Answer: B) demand determined.
Explanation:
If the supply of a good is fixed or the product is of a unique kind, the price of the good will be determined by the amount of demand for it.
Normally supply can change based on the quantity demanded which will impact prices but if the supply is definite, this means that the supply curve is inelastic and the only curve that can affect price therefore is the demand curve.
If more people demand the good, it will increase in price and if less people demand it, it will fall in price.
A seller's willingness to accept is the same as his marginal cost of production.
Marginal cost is the increase or decrease in cost of production if the output is increased. The marginal cost of production is the change in the total cost of the product from producing one addition item.
Answer:
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Explanation:
Is necessary to consider different amount of suppliers and evaluate the cost. We will choose the number of suppliers which offers a lower cost.
- EMV1 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk + cost of managing supplier = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05+16000 = 9600 + 24000 + 16000 = $ 49600
- EMV2 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk of each supplier*unique event risk of each supplier + cost of managing 2 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 1200 + 16000*2 = $ 42800
- EMV3 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of managing 3 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 16000*3 = $ 57600
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
