Answer:
True, but it rarely works well.
Explanation:
The most recent and largest failure by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has just happened in Argentina, where the government received over $50 billion in loans that it is unable to pay. The IMF has never been successful in any country where it has helped to develop a new economic plan. Ironically, some Nobel prize winners (including Joseph Stiglitz) tell countries to do exactly the opposite to what the IMF tells them to do, and that has worked much better.
On the other hand, the World Bank has had some limited success in South American countries like Bolivia and Uruguay, specially with helping to develop new industries or expand existing ones. In Bolivia it helped to develop a new agricultural plan that improved the economy of the Santa Cruz region a lot, and it is one of its major economic successes. In Uruguay it financed new projects related to paper businesses that increased the nations GDP by almost 10%.
This is the reason why the IMF has such a bad rep while the World Bank is still seen as a valid option for financing large investment projects.
Answer: Expenses or losses that are tax deductible before they are recognized in financial income.
Explanation:
Future taxable amounts arise as a result of a difference between the way an asset or liability is recorded due to the company's financial accounting principles and the way it should be recorded due to taxation principles of the government.
When this happens you will find that some things are not taxed as they should be, but rather as the company records them to be. These differences are only temporary though and correct themselves as time goes on.
An example of such are expenses of losses. Some expenses for instance may be taxable immediately but are instead only taxed in the business over the term of the expense.
The correct answer is true. It is because if the contract
term is likely ambiguous, the court will likely consider this as an extrinsic
evidence or that the ambiguity is likely to be interpreted against the party
who is responsible for drafting the term.
Answer:
<u>macro risk</u> and <u>micro risk.</u>
Explanation:
Political risks are crucial factors for a multinational company to make investments in a given country, due to the instability of the country's political scenario that can bring negative adverse effects to the company in a context of macro risk and micro risk.
Macro risk is that which is inherent in the country and affects all economic sectors equally, such as the risk of government expropriation.
Micro risk, on the other hand, is one that will impact only a specific business sector, such as corruptions that aim to defraud or harm an organization.
Answer:
a) grocery items to grocery stores
Explanation:
Business -to -business (B2B) sales occur between different companies unlike Business to Consumer (B2C) sales that are between a company and a individual customers. To answer this question, you identify an option that shows that a wholesaler sells goods to a retailer who then sells to a customer which is supply of grocery items to grocery stores.
'Automobile insurance to a pet shop owner' and 'evening gowns to Oscar award nominees' are B2C. And 'a washing machine to a theatre company' is irrelevant
