Answer:
1. Taking care of these systems would ensure smooth cellular metabolism.
2. It would reduce the risk of heart diseases.
3. It would help in the maintenance of the right pH for the blood.
4. It would allow for the easy removal of the waste products from the body.
Explanation:
The respiratory system refers to the series of processes that begin with the inhalation of air and its movement across the blood vessels and eventual discharge from the body. Oxygen which is a very important gas needed to sustain life is inhaled during respiration. It is also circulated through the circulatory system to the cells and tissues that need it.
Taking care of these systems through exercise, rest, and eating the right foods will protect us from diseases that affect them such as Heart attack. Cells would also function well and not die easily because they can access the oxygen needed for them to thrive. The right balance of these gases would also ensure that the proper pH of the body is being maintained.
The South Carolina General Assembly did a "Resolution to Call the Election of Abraham Lincoln as U.S. President a Hostile Act" in 1860
Answer:
Germanic peoples
Explanation:
Jump to navigation Jump to search. The Franks (Latin: Franci or gens Francorum) were a group of Germanic peoples, whose name was first mentioned in 3rd century Roman sources, associated with tribes on the Lower and Middle Rhine, on the edge of the Roman Empire.
Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
