1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
asambeis [7]
3 years ago
5

What was the reason for superpowers to engage in an arms race with a strategy of mutually assured destruction?

History
2 answers:
Marat540 [252]3 years ago
6 0

i think it is A i mean it seems most logical

KonstantinChe [14]3 years ago
5 0

I also think it is A.

You might be interested in
Which scenario could occur without the supremacy clause?
Agata [3.3K]
The correct option is C.
The supremacy clause states that the under the constitution of the United States of America, the federal laws are superior to state laws, therefore in time of conflict between the federal and the state law, the state law has to bow to federal law. Thus, the supremacy clause is used when federal and state laws are in conflict. 
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Define ordinance power
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

Under the Constitution, the power to make laws rests with the legislature. However, in cases when Parliament is not in session, and 'immediate action' is needed, the President can issue an ordinance. An ordinance is a law, and could introduce legislative changes

Explanation:

google

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Afghanistan was harboring al Qaeda terrorists. In the preceding sentence, what does "to harbor" mean? 5Afghanistan was harboring
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

B.) To provide protection

Explanation:

In the sentence, "to harbor" mean to provide protection to somebody. The actual meaning of harbor refers to a place where ships and boats can be docked in the water. There is no water body or ocean present around Afghanistan so the actual meaning of harbor does not apply. So that's why the harbor word is used for giving protection.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the British government respond to the colonist reactions?
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

The ultimate response of the British government to these protests was to repeal the Townshend Acts. They revoked all of the taxes imposed by these acts except for the tax on tea. When the Townshend taxes were imposed, there was a great deal of protest in the colonies.

5 0
3 years ago
How did William t Sherman benefit the civil war
Jet001 [13]
He served as a general in the Union Army during the American Civil War, for which he received recognition for his outstanding command of military strategy
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Answer the following question in paragraph form. How did the government impact the country’s growth during and after the Progres
    6·1 answer
  • How many copies of "common sense" were published
    7·2 answers
  • How did alliances contribute to the start of World War I?
    9·2 answers
  • Select the two factors that characterized the Jacksonian Era. SELECT ALL THAT APPLY A. "King mob" rule B. Every citizen was impo
    13·1 answer
  • With a prehistoric location, which local resource does not determine human activities?
    11·1 answer
  • How is America influencing other countries
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I NEED TO GET THIS WRITE PLEASEEE PLEASE IM BEGGIN YOU ANYONE PLEASE. 4-5 PARAGRAPHS PLEASEE
    11·1 answer
  • in which way does the due process clause best represent the spirit and goals of the U.S. bill of rights
    8·1 answer
  • As a congress-person, your constituency is:
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT a major cash crop in the southern colonies?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!