Answer:
Quality control
Explanation:
Six Sigma is a quality business management strategy which helps business organizations to improve the quality of processes, products and services by discovering and eliminating defects, variations or errors. It is a strategic business concept that was developed in 1986 by Motorola.
Under the six sigma approach, any process that doesn't provide customer satisfaction or causes challenges in an organisation's process should be eliminated from the system in order to produce quality products and services. It allows only 3.4 defective features for every million opportunities and as such expects processes to be defect free 99.99966 percent of the time.
Generally, there are two (2) main methods of achieving the six sigma approach;
1. DMAIC: define, measure, analyze, improve and control.
2. DMADV: define, measure, analyze, design and verify.
Hence, a pre-concert rehearsal is an example of quality control because the participants or team members are made to practice their routines so as to master them and prevent mistakes on the day of the concert. Thus, a pre-concert is aimed at getting the best out of a team in order to deliver a quality performance to the audience.
I would say the answer is retail sales, no sales= no business= no money= bankrupt
The factors that led Darden to take its current approach to employees development and advancement include the following:
1. Darden sees employees as very vital resources which can give a company a real competitive advantage.
2. The company promote employee inputs, appreciate their efforts and make it possible for workers to work their ways from the bottom of the ladder to the managerial positions.
The two significant issues regarding the ceo pay debate are -
a) the relationship between firm performance and CEO pay
b) the size of the CEO compensation in relation to average employee pay
Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) often receive large sums of money in the form of salaries and bonuses from commercial companies. This is sometimes defended by a peer-to-peer argument; roughly "our" CEO will be paid what other CEOs of comparable companies receive.
On the face of it, this seems like a bad excuse for morally outrageous compensation schemes, and thus this argument has been overlooked in the philosophical literature in the past. In contrast, however, this article provides a defense of the peer-to-peer argument. In addition, it is shown how rigorous examination of this argument sheds light on incentive-based and desert-based theories of fair wages.
To learn more about CEO pay from given link
brainly.com/question/16557894
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. A long position is a bet that the number is going to fall while a short position is a bet that the number will rise in the future.
Explanation:
The derivative contract is a contract in which the contract is to be done between two or more parties regarding the value i.e. depend upon the financial asset i.e. underlying. It involves the bonds, commodities, etc
So according to the given options, the option a is correct as long position is a bet in which the number is to be decline while on the other hand in the short position the number would increase