Answer: The options are given below:
A. a diversity-oriented employer
B. a wide span of control
C. the glass ceiling effect
D. the black swan effect
E. an affirmative action
The correct option is C. The Glass Ceiling Effect
Explanation: The glass ceiling is a term used in organizations, it is a metaphor that is used to refer to an invisible and artificial barrier that prevents women and minority groups from being promoted to top managerial and executive level positions within an organization.
The scenario presented above is a perfect example of the glass ceiling effect, this is because, though Brenda is qualified for the promotion, she is denied it regardless, because "that's just the way things are". As you can see, the reason for the denial of her promotion is not a professional issue, just a tradition to always suppress the advancement of certain categories of people.
Answer:
$35 per hour
Explanation:
Data provided;
The John has 2 alternatives to choose from
Alternative 1 offers him $50 per hour
Alternative 2 offers him $35 per hour
John opts for the Alternative 1 i.e $50 per hour
Now,
The opportunity cost is given as the next high valued alternative and for the given question, we have the next high valued alternative of $35 per hour
Hence,
the opportunity cost of choosing the alternative 1 i.e job offering $50 per hour is $35 per hour
Answer:
B. All of these are correct.
Explanation:
- The restriction must not be more broad than is necessary to serve the substantial government interest.
- The restriction must directly advance the substantial government interest.
- The government interest that will be advanced by the restriction must be substantial.
Answer:
decreased by 20%
Explanation:
Supposed we have input price of $30,000 and it produced an output of 300 units on the first year of operation. The cost per unit on the first year is $100 each ($30,000/300).
On the second year we still have the same input expense of $30,000 but the productivity output increased by 25%. So we have 375 units produced on the second year’s operation. The new cost per unit would be $30,000/375=$80 per unit.
Therefore we conclude that based on the example given, the new unit cost per product decreases by 20%.
$100-80 = $20
$20/$100 = 20%
Answer:
the long-run average total cost curve rises
Explanation
Diseconomies of scale is a situation that comes up due to the growth of a business which leads to increase in cost per unit. It is the cost disadvantage a business accrue as a result of increase in output leading to increase in cost per unit in the production of goods and services. When diseconomies of scale occur, as output rises unit cost falls.
