Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
1.function 1 has a greater rate of change than function 2
3. Function 1 has a greater y-intercept than function 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the table we can find the slope using
m = (y2-y1)/ (x2-x1)
m = (29-5)/ (8-0)
= 24/8
= 3
The rate of change for the table is 3
The y intercept is (0,5)
Using the graph (0,-1) and (2,0)
m = (y2-y1)/ (x2-x1)
m = (0--1)/ (2-0)
= (0+1)/2
= 1/2
The y intercept is (0,-1)
Since 3>1/2 , function 1 has a greater rate of change than function 2
Since 5>-1, function 1 has a greater y-intercept than function 2
Answer: 0.1 OR 1/10
Step-by-step explanation:
Think about it: There's 1/2 bag of oranges, and you wanna know what number of oranges used in the juice. Take 1/2, and divided it by 5. You get 0.1, then you should turn it into a fraction, giving you 1/10.
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
2015: 9 games won
2014: 1 game won
rate of change = 2015 games won - 2014 games won
rate of change = 9 - 1
rate of change = 8
Just plug in -1 for x and u should get ur answer
