Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
Answer:
excavation
Explanation:
Excavation retains its central role in field-work because it yields the most reliable evidence for human activities in the past and changes in those activities from period to period.
In archeology, excavation is the procedure by which archaeologists define, retrieve, and record cultural and biological remains found in the ground. It is an important archaeological tool for understanding the processes of the human past. Past activities leave traces in the form of house foundations, graves, artifacts, bones, seeds, and numerous other traces which are helpful in studying the way of life of the people who lived in that era. Excavation helps uncover this remains.
Answer:
Ecological validity
Explanation:
Ecological validity is define as the way in which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real life settings.
Owens et al. (2011) manipulating texting while driving conditions (i.e., driving with no texting, driving while texting on a personal phone, driving while texting using an in-vehicle texting system) to see if this influenced visual and steering behaviors of drivers. Participants completed the task by texting the researcher on a closed course. The testing conditions serves as the ecological validity in which the researchers use his finding to generalize it to a real life setting thereby using it to predict the behaviour of the participants in real world settings.
Answer:A plea bargain
Explanation:
A plea bargain refers to a negotiation that is made between a defendant and a prosecutor in which a defendant is advised to plead guilty so that they can get a lesser sentences than when they don't plead guilty. This may go along with some conditions such as doing community service. A plea deal gives some benefits to a defendant that will lessen what would have been a worse penalty for their action. This is however dependent on the condition that a defendant will not break any conditions mentioned under a plea deal.
Plea bargain are accused of being a way of letting guilty guys go free ,when a person who isn't actual guilt plead guilty to a crime they didn't commit.
Answer:
Phylogenetic tree reveals evolutionary relationships between different organisms, their common ancestor, and descendants.
