I know i'm late on this question but the answer is D
I believe it is True okay hope your get it right
thought it was unconstitutional and argued against it,
Answer:
People do not act or behave with predictable consistency
Explanation:
One of the general criticisms of the trait perspective is that people do not act or behave with predictable consistency. This is based on the idea that a person might act differently as predicted or expected of them given the circumstances, their personal experiences, their mental and cognitive state at that point and other such factors. Hence, the trait perspective might not be able to provide an accurate description based on habitual patterns of behavior or action or thoughts.
Answer:
Cognitive development
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing, the options are:
latent content.
change blindness.
night terrors.
cognitive development
In psychology, the term cognitive development refers to the development of our minds, especially to the complexity of our thoughts. In psychology, there are many schools and theories that focus on cognitive development and they all agree that <u>as we grow older, our cognitive abilities increase until certain point around mid-age and then start to decrease. </u>They also agree on the fact that <u>small children have a less developed train of thought. </u>
<u />
In this example, prior to age 9, children's dreams seem more like a slide show and less like an active story. This can be associated with the fact that <u>by this age, cognitive development of children is still not as logic and rational as an adult's one.</u> Therefore, this best illustrates that the content of dreams reflects cognitive development.
