Due to the first rule of labor markets, a firm strives to maximize its profits and will therefore never pay more for a worker than the value of his/her marginal productivity to the firm. Therefore, the option A holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of profit maximization?</h3>
A process of following and adapting such methods that derive maximum revenue to the firm is known as profit maximization. It should be the primary goal of any firm in the market.
The first rule of labor markets says that when a firm strives for profit maximization, it does not pay the worker or the labor, more than the marginal productivity that the worker bring to the firm.
Therefore, the option A holds true regarding profit maximization.
Learn more about profit maximization here:
brainly.com/question/17233964
#SPJ4
The question seems to be missing. The complete question has been added for better reference.
Due to the ________ a firm strives to maximize its profits and will therefore never pay more for a worker than the value of his/her marginal productivity to the firm.
a. first rule of labor markets
b. demand product value
c. third rule of labor markets
Answer:
Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Given information states that bananas and tangerines are substitute goods. We know that the cross price elasticity of substitute goods is positive which means that there is a positive relationship between the price of one good and the quantity demanded for substitute good.
Therefore, in our case as the price of bananas increases and all the other factors remains constant then as a result the quantity demanded for tangerines increases.
Answer: Partial Productivity.
Explanation:
Goldie is making use of partial productivity to evaluate her company's performance. Partial Productivity is a method of calculating productivity by comparing the total output to a fraction of the input.
Partial Productivity =
output / single input
From the given original cost and the total accumulated depreciation of the old equipment, it can be seen that the value of the equipment should still be $180,000.
salvage value = $600,000 - $420,000 = $180,000
Given that it can be sold for only $18,000, the sunken cost is $162,000.
sunken cost = $180,000 - $18,000 = $162,000
